On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:32:37AM +0000, Paul M Kane - CWG wrote:
At the start of the document to clarify the intent:
The principles contained within this document are intended to provide guidance to members of the CWG in their work in formulating proposal(s) for stable transition of the IANA functions contract from NTIA. This means that the proposals can be tested against the principles and criteria before they are sent to the ICG.
If this were modified to say "transition of the IANA names functions in the IANA functions contract…" or something of that sort I think it'd be better. This constraining of scope was something I suggested before, and I don't want it to get lost because I don't believe this WG is chartered to try to provide alternatives to the number resources or protocol parameters communities.
Regarding 7ii)
May I suggest the text reads: For ccTLDs – Respect national laws as well as any applicable consensus ICANN Policies developed by the appropriate PDP mechanism and IETF technical standards.
I can live with that. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com