Hello Grace, all Thanks for the share and thanks to those that populated the responses as well. Just 1 minor comment/clarification; considering that .ARPA is for special purposes, one would expect that there are independent monitoring process that already exist so I was thinking it would be appropriate not to have it included in CSC/IFR processes. It may be good to follow-up with IAB on this (unless one would assume they are reading this and as such are fine with it) Regards On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
Following the call today, Marika and I have reviewed the responses to the ICG Questions and prepared a redline and clean version for your review. We received some text from Alan Greenberg for the RZM questions and some text from Donna Austin for the .ARPA/CSC question. To summarize our edits, please refer to the notes from the call:
*3. ICG Questions - review of draft responses*
- ICG sent two batches of questions which are presented in the document on screen. CWG has already provided answers to questions. - On RZM question #1: ICG misunderstood the NTIA/Versign proposal. - On RZM question #2: we have a Standing Panel to approve substantial changes. So the answer includes, community consultation, expert consultation, and Board approval. Refer to paragraph 155 in the CWG Proposal (1155 in the ICG). *Alan Greenberg: *Proposed reply to Question 2: Both descriptions are correct but incomplete. The full answer is addressed in paragraph ICG 1155 (CWG 155). A change in the responsibilities of the IANA Functions Operator and the Root Zone Maintainer is clearly a substantial architectual and operational change, and is therefore subject to a review of the standing review committee and ultimately ICANN Board approval. Subsection 5 of paragraph 155/1155 requires consultation through an ICANN Public Comment Process. - On ccTLD questions #3, #4, #5: These were drafted by the ccTLD members/participants. No comments or concerns. Thank you ccTLD members/participants. - On PTI question #6: complete. no comments - On PTI question #7: Clarify text referring to "Community Mechanism" since the CCWG-Accountability is currently working this out. Additional clarfications listed in action item. - On PTI question #8: no comments other than cross-checking with implementation. - On PTI question #9: PTI Board is responsible, but there is also recourse to the ICANN Board. Confirm with lawyers - On questions #10, #11, #12 on scope: no comments - On question #13: representative of IAB or appointed person will be involved in process.
*Summary of current status on ICG questions*
- Further work needed on questions #1, #2, #7, #9, #13 - Provisionally closed questions: #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #10, #11, #12
ACTIONS
- *Action*(staff): update Question #1 text on RZM with latest sent to list (by Alan) - *Action*(staff): update question #2 per notes - *Action*(staff): incorporate Christopher's input (and any other input received) where appropriate - *Action*(staff): Clarify text referring to "Community Mechanism" (perhaps by capitalizing the word Mechanism to refer to structure and by making a direct reference to the CCWG-Accountability). Add "in the event that there is divergence between the Board and the Community on an IFR decision/recommendation, the Community will be able to rely on other mechanisms that are being developed by the CCWG." - *Action*(staff): update question #9 to include recourse to ICANN Board. - *Action*(Chairs): run updated answer to question #9 by the lawyers - *Action*(staff): staff to draft response to #13
Best, Grace
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>* Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!