Due to the inappropriate reactions made by the sender of this mail to me and pressure put on me that I had no option but to totally agreed to the draft without any rights to comments and due to the prevailing practice practices exercised by some country and the rigid reference to those practice, I see the whole exercise purely a formality If no comments are accepted what is the usefulness of such process. I was said during the last process that subcommittee and lawyers have already agreed and there is no room to make any proposal, This is not a democratic, open , transparent button- up multistsjeholder approach. In fact it is outcome of a limited Group member of a given circle We are stranger people and gave no rights to even open our mouth Kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 9 Aug 2016, at 00:29, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
Please see below and attached regarding the latest draft of the IANA IPR license agreement. Please read the cover email from Josh Hofheimer (CWG counsel from Sidley) carefully. Please note that this form will be used to create 3 parallel licenses, one for each IANA Service, each of which will run between the IETF Trust and the IANA Operator (currently, ICANN).
Please review and reply with any comments you may have.
Best regards,
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Hofheimer, Joshua T. <jhofheimer@sidley.com> Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:18 PM Subject: FW: Draft IANA License Agreement To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info>, Lise Fuhr <lise.fuhr@difo.dk> Cc: "Flanagan, Sharon" <sflanagan@sidley.com>, "Gregory, Holly" <holly.gregory@sidley.com>, "Grapsas, Rebecca" <rebecca.grapsas@sidley.com>, "Resnick, Yael" <yresnick@sidley.com>
Dear Client Committee,
Attached is a clean working draft of the IPR License Agreement. As with the Community Agreement, this is an iterative version prepared jointly by counsel (Sidley) to the CWG and counsel to the IETF Trust to reflect the 7-point discussion items. To be clear, it is an ongoing work in progress, but we believe ready for the CWG to have an opportunity for review. This is intended to be released for public comment on Thursday, August 11, along with a revised draft of the Community Agreement.
Two redlines are attached, plus the clean:
· PDF marked against the ICANN draft on August 2.
· Redline Track Changes marked against the IETF Trust draft on July 30
· Clean draft, August 8
The redlines appear heavily marked as they predate the 7-Point discussion items reviewed with CWG previously. The main changes here are to cut back any independent discretion the IETF Trust might have exerted over the performance and quality of the IANA Services. This license agreement along with the Community Agreement, makes clear the oversight of the IANA Services is reserved to the applicable Operational Community – Names, Number or Protocols, as applicable. Otherwise, we believe this draft effectively implements the compromises reached and reflected in the 7-Point discussion items.
Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.
Cheers,
Josh
Joshua Hofheimer
Sidley Austin LLP
jhofheimer@sidley.com
(213) 896-6061 (LA direct)
(650) 565-7561 (Palo Alto direct)
(323) 708-2405 (cell)
From: iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net [mailto:iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net] On Behalf Of Jorge Contreras Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 2:44 PM To: iana-ipr@nro.net Subject: [Iana-ipr] Draft IANA License Agreement
All – attached is a revised draft of the IANA IPR License Agreement template, reflecting substantial discussions among the legal team over the last several days, as well as input from various communities.
A clean version with a few comments for your consideration is attached, as well as a version marked against ICANN’s version of Aug. 2.
Please feel free to send any comments, corrections or discussion by email in advance of our Wednesday call.
Best regards
Jorge
Jorge L. Contreras
Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
Washington, DC 20036
contreraslegal@att.net
The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
**************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately.
****************************************************************************************************
<License Agreement IANA IPR 08-08-2016 - marked vs ICANN 8-2.pdf> <License Agreement IANA IPR 08-08-2016 clean.docx> <Redline License Agreement IANA IPR - August 8 vs July 30 Draft.DOCX> _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship