As the drafter of the section on the standing committee, I can live with either formulation. I don't think there is much chance of one of those groups not participating given the potential risks. So I leave it up to the co-chairs to select. Andrew, I presume you meant item 3.C, not B. Alan At 05/08/2015 01:50 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Hi, In the item 3.b. question 2 draft response, it isn't clear to me how the first sentence responds to the question. It seems to me that the answer can start with "Since the standing committee makes recommendationsÂ…," contiinuing to the end. (This has the happy consequence also of removing the proposed make up of the committee from consideration. If any of those bodies were to decline the invitation to participate that premise would be weaker. But if we can just discard the premise in the argument without harm, then we might as well do so.) A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship