March 11, 2015
8:20 p.m.
Hi, On 11-Mar-15 15:58, Martin Boyle wrote:
5.iv footnote: We had comments about the meaning of consensus in the footnote. I do not think that defining consensus is in the remit of this document, but is part of the considerations of any entity that we establish. Hence I have added, “Conditions for consensus will need to be agreed appropriate for the group” to make this clear. In response to Christopher Wilkinson, I have amended the footnote to read “one or more members”.
as this was my issue, just wanted to say I am comfortable with the change. Thanks avri --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com