Agree - David raises an important point. On 6/15/2016 4:06 AM, Lise Fuhr wrote:
Full support for going ahead asap.
Lise
*From:*cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Robinson *Sent:* 15 June 2016 09:36 *To:* 'Gomes, Chuck'; cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Cc:* 'Maher, David' *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations
Chuck,
Thank-you. Lise and I had talked about getting this dealt as an instruction coming out of the next CWG meeting.
However, I take your point that it would be good to get it answered in time for the meeting if possible.
Are there any objections to referring this to Sidley immediately?
Jonathan
*From:*Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com] *Sent:* 14 June 2016 01:10 *To:* jrobinson@afilias.info <mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>; cwg-stewardship@icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> *Cc:* Maher, David <dmaher@pir.org <mailto:dmaher@pir.org>> *Subject:* RE: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations
Jonathan,
Please note the following input I received on this from David Maher in the RySG:
“In the Sidley draft legal memo regarding PTI and ICANN (April 18, 2015), they say:
“This will ensure that the IANA naming functions is both functionally and legally “ring fenced” from the ICANN entity.”
The proposed secondment of virtually all PTI personnel from ICANN appears to me to pose a legal risk that PTI would not be considered a separate corporation under California law. I suggest that Sidley be asked to look into this. ”
As David suggests, I think it would be very good if the client committee requested Sidley to look into this as soon as possible so that we could have their response prior to our next CWG meeting.
Chuck
*From:*cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Robinson *Sent:* Monday, June 13, 2016 1:16 PM *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations
All,
FYI.
Please note We did not have an IOTF call today so have not yet had the opportunity to discuss this item.
Jonathan
*From:*Yuko Green [mailto:yuko.green@icann.org] *Sent:* 10 June 2016 18:05 *To:* iotf@icann.org <mailto:iotf@icann.org> *Subject:* [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations
Dear members of the IOTF,
Attached, please find the rationale for PTI staffing recommendations we have made in the PTI Implementation Approach document. We look forward to hearing any feedback you may have.
Regards,
*Yuko Green*
Strategic Programs Manager
Global Domains Division
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Direct Line: +1 310 578 8693
Mobile: +1 310 745 1517
E-mail: yuko.green@icann.org <mailto:yuko.green@icann.org>
www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/>
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-- Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project Center for Democracy & Technology | cdt.org E: mshears@cdt.org | T: +44.771.247.2987