Dear all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Call #33 - 2 April are available here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52893469 Action Items Action item (DTs): DTs to review content template example and aim to provide their content in a similar format. Action item (staff): publish schedule with call dates/times and milestones between now and Buenos Aires Action item (CWG members): members to inform their respective SO/ACs and ensure that chartering organization are fully informed of work of CWG Action item (all): everyone to review communication materials and provide feedback. Action item (Lise): Principles to be circulated for final review. Notes Notes 2/4: Roll call based on AC attendance. On audio only: none 1. Opening Remarks * * Primary purpose of call is to ensure that design teams are working as planned and are able to provide any updates as needed * Target date for content for draft proposal is 10 April * Producing two variants of proposal: short form proposal - more readily accessible and comprable to already submitted proposals; long form proposal including all the details. * Call scheduled for 60 minutes * Communication materials have been sent out to the mailing list and an updated version of the handout will be circulated after this meeting. 2. Design Teams * * Standardization of DT content: objective to standardise how DT content is provided to facilitate inclusion into the proposal. See Design Team M template as an example (to be circulated after the call). All DT encouraged to take a similar approach. * Status Updates: See DT Status Overview circulated prior to the meeting. * DT A - still waiting for input from IANA staff. Informal feedback has been shared in which some concerns and questions have been expressed. CWG to consider how to deal with this. Staff to work with IANA staff to get formal response and encourage participation. What is a reasonable basis to go forward - are existing and/or proposed SLEs reasonable? Final proposal should include a mutually agreed set of SLEs, draft proposal could provide indication of desired SLEs. Any changes should be based on facts - current agreement may be outdated. Further improvements may also be made post-transition, and a process should be in place for that. * DT M covers root zone emergency process, although it currently does not include an SLE. DT A to consider whether there should be an SLE associated with this process, in consultation with IANA staff. * DT B - no update. Survey response deadline is 3 April. * DT C - reviewing input received in Istanbul, need to connect with DT M concerning escalation, meeting scheduled for later this afternoon. * DT D - Completed. Validation will be covered, now by another DT (possibly F) * DT E - Completed. Output will feed into the Red Team. * DT F - Work on scoping document has been completed. Awaiting approval in order to move ahead. * DT L - No further updates at this stage. DT is looking at a transition plan which is also required under the current contract. Disaster transition plan - if an emergency happens, how can business continuity be guaranteed. Is about the mechanics, not about whether separation is appropriate or not. * DT M - Continuing its work and aiming to complete its work by 10 April. What are triggers for escalation mechanism - is that being addressed? Yes, by DT M and DT C. Also expected to be covered as part of the legal advice so may need to be revisited after further input has been received. DT C and M to keep triggers in mind as part of their work. At some point it may move over to CCWG. * DT N - Still working to the original plan and aims to complete its work by 10 April. * DT O - Has met earlier this week and is aming to complete its work by 10 April. Action item (DTs): DTs to review content template example and aim to provide their content in a similar format. 3. Draft Proposal a. Schedule moving forward DT to deliver content by 10 April. Intensive working days on 13 and 14 April. Prepare draft for publication for public comment by 20 April. Call invites will be sent out shortly. Action item (staff): publish schedule with call dates/times and milestones between now and Buenos Aires b. Members outreach Action item (CWG members): members to inform their respective SO/ACs and ensure that chartering organization are fully informed of the work of the CWG. 4. Communications materials from Xplane Materials provided by Xplane are aimed to facilitate members outreach to chartering organizations. Three documents have been circulated: handout (updated version will be circulated) summary of day 1 (DT discussion) and summary of day 2 (different models). Action item (all): everyone to review communication materials and provide feedback. 5. AOB Principles to be nearly complete - will be circulated for final review (please focus on those items that were still outstanding and do not reopen issues previously dealt with) Action item (Lise): Principles to be circulated for final review. CCWG would welcome further guidance concerning conditionality with work stream one. Chairs were interviewed by GAO - considered a routine update on CWG work. CCWG chairs are also to be interviewed and individual members have been approached as well. Chairs will review priority 2 design teams and assess whether further work on those is still required. Client committee is meeting later today to ensure lawyers understand expectations and timeline.
