Thanks. I had not seen that. If I were ICANN and about to hand over the TM, I would want to see something stronger than just "hold", but perhaps to lawyers that is sufficient to imply will police and defend. But I am not speaking on behalf of ICANN. Alan At 05/08/2015 05:15 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:06:05PM -0400, Alan Greenberg wrote:
However, I would find it useful to have a clear and unambiguous statement from the Trustees on behalf of the IETF Trust saying that the Trust has the will and resources to adequately police and enforce the IANA trademark.
Hi,
Does https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/slides/slides-93-iesg-opsplenary-2.pdf (see slide 8) address your concern? This was presented at the administrative plenary session in Prague recently, and is duly recorded in the minutes posted at http://trustee.ietf.org/documents/Trust-Minutes-2015-06-25-01.pdf.
Note that, while I'm one of the trustees (by virtue of being IAB chair), I'm speaking only for myself here.
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship