Dear Milton, On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
Martin: I do not know what "who nominally should be able to drive consensus" means. The word 'nominally' is not what bothers me, it is the word "drive consensus." I think it should say something like, "whose agreement or nonobjection would be required to achieve consensus."
Further, the definition is a bit one dimensional. One can capture institutions in many more ways than simply dictating or defining consensus. For example, one could capture a process by gaining the power to exclude critical or dissenting voices from ever being represented in a consensus process (e.g., something akin to the way nominating committees often work - the alternate views or controversial people are never selected by those in power and then the select group has no trouble at all achieving consensus).
Without any allusion to any Nominating Committee, if a legitimate and "fair" Nomcom excludes an extreme or harmful voice, it might rather be categorized as "retention of control" rather than the opposite - "capture". Retention of control is defensive while capture is an offensive move. At the same time, there is the danger of such a selection process itself being captured in pursuit of narrow interests with a view to determine the course of the selection process by making it work by excluding voices that would question the narrow interests ( I am using words like 'legitimate', 'fair' 'narrow', try replacing them with simpler words - good and bad, without asking profound questions such as what is good or how do we decide what is good). In such an instance where the selection process is captured for illegitimate ends, then it would amount to capture through Nomcom. Otherwise a good Nomcom could work in ways that are not easily understood, and it may not be termed as "capture" as such.
The concept of "capture," which has its roots in regulatory economics referring to the capture of regulatory agencies by the regulated industry, and is not just about consensus. It's also about revolving doors between regulator and industry, about dominating the information flow within an institution, etc.
"Capture" means different things to different people in different environments. Sivasubramanian
-----Original Message----- From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Martin Boyle Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 3:12 AM To: Alan Greenberg; CWG Stewardship Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles: Capture
Thanks Alan, that is helpful.
Just so I am sure that I understand the implications correctly, what we are saying is that there needs to be a positive engagement to support any particular outcome or decision or direction of travel. Limited response and abstentions (unless because of conflict of interest, I suppose) would be a measure of capture.
Obviously the principles are not the place to set markers, but your draft footnote would at least give a measureable basis for capture that might need to be addressed in the final proposal.
Thanks for your proposal. I'd welcome any comments on it from other participants or members of the CWG.
Martin
-----Original Message----- From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: 06 January 2015 02:13 To: CWG Stewardship Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles: Capture
A long time ago, I said I would come up with a footnote for the Principles document that defined Capture.
"A group can be considered captured when one or more stakeholders are able to effectively control outcomes despite lack of agreement from other stakeholders who nominally should be able to drive consensus.
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship