I support this as well. Greg On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Lindeberg, Elise <elise.lindeberg@nkom.no> wrote:
Also in support !
Elise
Elise Lindeberg
Senior Legal Adviser
Norwegian GAC representative
Norwegian Communications Authority
Dir. +47 22 824607 Mob. +47 90190947
ekl@nkom.no
*Fra:* cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] *På vegne av* Jian C. Chang *Sendt:* 7. mars 2016 17:06 *Til:* Eduardo Diaz; jrobinson@afilias.info; cwg-stewardship *Emne:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] IANA Stewardship Implementation
Agree and support Jonathan's proposal.
+1 to Mathew, not DT lead too, but will be happy to participate in the task force if necessary.
Jian Chang
KNET
------------------------------
*From:* Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com>
*Date:* 2016-03-07 23:56
*To:* jrobinson <jrobinson@afilias.info>; cwg-stewardship <cwg-stewardship@icann.org>
*Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] IANA Stewardship Implementation
I do support this proposal.
Thanks for being so attentive to these details.
-ed
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:13 PM Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
All,
Lise and I today attended the session entitled:
https://meetings.icann.org/en/marrakech55/schedule/mon-iana-stewardship-impl...
It became clear during the course of the session that material new details on the implementation of the CWG Stewardship proposal were being released for the first time.
This raises two issues:
1. Process – How do we ensure that ICANN implementation staff do not get out of synchronisation with the CWG?
2. Substance – Do we agree with the details presented in the session today?
Both Lise and I stood up and made points to this effect during the meeting as did some of the CWG Stewardship Members / Participants.
We also spoke with Akram & Trang afterwards. It does seem that this was an inadvertent oversight driven by a desire and need to make progress.
However, it is also evident that there is a need for the ICANN staff implementation team to have more rapid or agile reference to the CWG, in addition to our bi-weekly updates / meetings.
Therefore, in order to address this need, the co-chairs propose to form an *implementation oversight task force* comprising the CWG co-chairs and the DT leads. The outcomes will come back to the CWG in any case but we believe that we need a capability to track the implementation work as closely as possible and as it evolves.
Please can we have any comments or concerns with this proposal as soon as possible.
Thank-you,
Lise and Jonathan
Co-Chairs, CWG Stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship