Quoting Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>:
Why is it no longer "fit for purpose"?
NTIA is not going to be there and many ccTLDs are not party to any agreement with ICANN What possible reason is there to
change the SLA,
We have recorded the ACTUAL IANA RZM performance with NTIA being involved using data published by IANA. An SLA prescribing 21 days to change a DS record or name server that bears no relation to actual performance delivered is not fit for purpose IMHO
except for the party to which the assurance is offered?
Correct - I agree The registry community need assurance that at the very least the actual performance delivered today continues post transition. We
have a running system, and we should change as little as possible as part of the transition: this is just prudent engineering.
Agree here too. The goal is not to change the system but to have proper monitoring Best Paul Ps I am travelling this w/end (no Internet access in 30 mins) back on Monday
A
-- Andrew Sullivan Please excuse my clumbsy thums.
On May 9, 2015, at 10:19, Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk> wrote:
Thanks Milton
I sincerely hope that ICANN legal are NOT interfering with how IANA staff deliver technical services to the community.
What DT-A has done is capture the current performance delivered by IANA as the baseline for any post transition SLE - see the a draft SLE document under discussion attached......
Currently IANA delivers to the community Name Server updates, DS Record updates, WHOIS updates well within a week - and this includes having NTIA in the loop - so having an SLA that stipulates 21days for such tasks is clearly no longer fit for purpose.
Attached is the statistical analysis of current performance based on IANA's data presented to the CWG in March
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52891144/DT-A_Statistical- Final.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1426003475000&api=v2
I genuinely believe IANA staff are trying to provide the information (true
IANA
needs to invest in monitoring the performance of their RZM systems - but that is trivial, two days of a competent programmers time would provide IANA and the community with the required matrices).
It would be a great shame for ICANN legal to prevent the IANA service which is delivered to the community today from being accurately captured by the SLE Group.... time will tell... and I am optimistic we will receive constructive input.
Best
Paul
Quoting Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>:
Better read the letter carefully, Paul It is pure 100% distilled essence of ICANN legal. As I read the letter, they have not given you anything that is not already published on the web.
-----Original Message----- From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul M Kane - CWG Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 2:50 PM To: Grace Abuhamad Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Fwd: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.
Grace,
Many thanks for helping DT-A obtain the current detailed IANA work flow information....
Have a great w/end
Best
Paul
Begin forwarded message:
----- Forwarded message from Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane- cwg@icb.co.uk> ----- Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 19:42:18 +0100 From: Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk> Reply-To: Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk> Subject: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info. To: Elise Gerich <elise.gerich@icann.org>
Thanks Elise
I confirm receipt of the response from ICANN Legal following our DIDP request.
On or after the 12th May 2015, we look forward to receiving the current detailed IANA process workflow documents (with comments as to why any "sensitive" information has been redacted) so we can work cooperatively with you to create a professional Service Level Expectation (SLE) document for the benefit of the whole community.
Have a great w/end
Best
Paul
<CWG-DRAFT-SLE-DTA.pdf> _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship