May 17, 2015
6:47 p.m.
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 06:30:21PM +0100, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Because it was an equally bad thing before, but equally not in need of urgent fixing?
Right, that's my point. There is nothing wrong with a transition plan that says of int, "Status quo ante, nothing to see here." Which is I think what is being suggested. That doesn't mean I think it should never be changed, but I don't see why it needs to be linked to this, any more than I think SLA changes or other not strictly relevant operational adjustments ought to be included. Best regards, A -- -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com Awkward access to mail. Please forgive formatting problems.