On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:27:22PM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
If you look at the Charters for the two WGs, you will see that there is an accountability piece for this WG and an (admittedly much broader) accountability piece for the other WG. This is not the "non-accountability WG." Figuring out how to apply the dividing line may be more art than science, and needs to be pragmatic rather than doctrinaire, but should at least use the Charters as a starting point.
Yes, and what I'm arguing is that, as a practical matter, what we should do is pick the very minimum we can, because it's nearly the end of February and this WG was supposed to have finished already. So, specifying the necessary and sufficient conditions of accountability necessary for the transition, and _not_ specifying how those conditions are to be achived (leaving that for a WG that is busy working on exactly those issues) seems to me to be a pragmatic approach. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com