Re Design Team C: CSC Please find link to my SOI as requested by Jonathan in mail below. https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Staffan+Jonson+SOI With best regards Staffan Staffan Jonson Senior Policy Adviser .SE (The Internet Infrastructure foundation) BOX 7399 | SE-103 91 STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN Tel. +46 8 452 35 74 | SMS: +46 73 317 39 67 staffan.jonson@iis.se twitter: @staffanjonson LinkedIn: se.linkedin.com/pub/staffan-jonson/4/574/a16/ Från: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] För Jonathan Robinson Skickat: den 10 mars 2015 10:44 Till: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Ämne: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs All, As an additional clarification, please note that DT-A, B and C have now been approved by the co-chairs, with a slight modification to the scope of DT-C, i.e. the removal of consideration of the authorization function since a separate DT will be dealing with that issue. As such, the co-chairs would welcome expressions of interest as soon as possible for members of DT-B and DT-C taking into account the membership structure: For Design Team B: * two or three ccTLD representatives * one or two GAC representatives. For Design Team C: * At a minimum two gTLD registry representatives with operational knowledge of IANA Functions and current reporting requirements * At a minimum two ccTLD registry representatives with operational knowledge of IANA Functions and current reporting requirements * One IANA staff member (current or former) * One non-direct customer representative with operational knowledge of IANA Functions and current reporting requirements * One liaison from NTIA to verify NTIA's current responsibilities As noted previously, members of design teams are expected to make the necessary time available to complete the tasks of the design team as well as having the necessary skills and expertise as identified in the proposed membership structure. Those interest to volunteer for a DT are expected to share their expression of interest with the CWG mailing list which is expected to include their Statement of Interest (SOI) or provide a link to the existing SOI as well as their qualification for the DT. The co-chairs in consultation with the DT lead, will review the volunteers that have come forward and determine the membership of the DT, ensuring sufficient expertise and a balanced membership. Thanks, Jonathan From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info] Sent: 09 March 2015 21:50 To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs All, Please see attached for a status update on the Design Teams in preparation for our call tomorrow. Lise and I have reviewed the whole DT landscape and the current status is reflected in the document. Please note that it contains the following: · A status for each DT per the model of the step-by-step process which has been referenced in Annex A. · A note section as part of the index to provide additional comments as needed · New prospective DTs added o L (IANA Function Separation Mechanism), o M (Escalation mechanisms beyond CSC) and o N (Periodic Review of IANA Functions). · An updated description for .INT DT to match description in draft transition proposal. · An 'expression of interest field', currently only in the Authorization Function DT-D (as other expression of interests come in, we'll create the same for other DTs). Where a priority is set as final, that is the priority we have agreed. Where it is provisional, that is indicative pending further detail on the DT emerging. I look forward to reviewing this with you on the tomorrow. Thanks, Jonathan