April 20, 2015
8:07 p.m.
Hi,
I guess it is aspirational.
Well, it might have been the aspiration of folks who attended the E.int (later E.910) ITU meetings in Geneva (which did not include ICANN staff to my knowledge I was general manager of IANA at that time so I probably would've known). That was a long time ago and many things have changed. I personally don't think it should have any bearing on how .INT is dealt with post-transition. Regards, -drc