Avri -- One more thing re the Integrated Model. While I believe it can be further discussed and refined in a design team, it is on the agenda for Tuesday's full CWG meeting. After that, it can probably be moved off into a design team for further refinement and then brought back to the full group. Greg On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
Avri,
The design teams (or task forces) are emphatically not only for process issues. For instance, in my view design teams need to be set up for issues such as the following:
1. Specifying and drafting service level documentation (specifying and drafting may be two different design teams, or just two different deliverables of one design team). 2. Specifying and drafting escalation documentation 3. Specifying and drafting reporting requirements documentation 4. IPR issues, including the IANA trademark and domain name 5. Replacing (or not) the NTIA validation/authorization function, and if replacing it, designing/documenting the function, and creating an implementation path (this may be 3 design teams)
As such, a design team to explore the Integrated Model would certainly fit.
As a final clarification, design teams are not decision teams; they are supposed to bring the draft deliverable(s) back to the full team for debate, discussion, revision and approval.
Greg
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
Are design team only for process issues?
If not, perhaps a design team, contingent on how Tuesday goes - of course, to further work on the Integrated Model approach.
But I am just not sure if this sort of topic fits the intent of the design teams.
avri
On 22-Feb-15 11:14, Lise Fuhr wrote:
Dear all,
This is a call for suggestions to design teams. If you have any issues that you think are relevant for a design team please provide the group with a submission of name, a brief description of topic and scope and finally an indication of who should to be lead of the team.
Included are an example of relevant design teams, the “Draft Working methods” and “Draft Design team Guidelines”.
Best regards,
Jonathan and Lise
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing listCWG-Stewardship@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
--
*Gregory S. Shatan **ï* *Abelman Frayne & Schwab*
*Partner* *| IP | Technology | Media | Internet*
*666 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621*
*Direct* 212-885-9253 *| **Main* 212-949-9022
*Fax* 212-949-9190 *|* *Cell *917-816-6428
*gsshatan@lawabel.com <gsshatan@lawabel.com>*
*ICANN-related: gregshatanipc@gmail.com <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>*
*www.lawabel.com <http://www.lawabel.com/>*
-- *Gregory S. Shatan **ï* *Abelman Frayne & Schwab* *Partner* *| IP | Technology | Media | Internet* *666 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621* *Direct* 212-885-9253 *| **Main* 212-949-9022 *Fax* 212-949-9190 *|* *Cell *917-816-6428 *gsshatan@lawabel.com <gsshatan@lawabel.com>* *ICANN-related: gregshatanipc@gmail.com <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>* *www.lawabel.com <http://www.lawabel.com/>*