Agreed, *Cheryl Langdon-O**rr ... *(CLO) about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr [image: Cheryl Langdon-Orr on about.me] <http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr> On 14 April 2015 at 19:24, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com> wrote:
However this is done, via a new DT or an existing team or another approach, I personally think giving more attention to this would be worthwhile. The template looks good to me. Thanks for doing this Avri.
Chuck
*From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Avri Doria *Sent:* Tuesday, April 14, 2015 4:23 AM *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] DT-X RFC Mechanism or work by any other formalism
Hi
Attached is a brief outline of a task definition, done in the form of section III templates.
I understand that we may be past the creation of new DTs, however the real issue is not the formalism we use to get the work done, but that this gap be filled before we submit a report.
The driver doc (open to comments) is at: <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WvBqtgXJ7rNrbN-5Tjf5-gi80aZ2oRYDtF_JLrET...> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WvBqtgXJ7rNrbN-5Tjf5-gi80aZ2oRYDtF_JLrET...>
avri
------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <http://www.avast.com/>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship