All, Please refer to this redline instead. The redlines in the file I previously circulated were marked against an older version and not the version that Josh had circulated on 7 September. This file contains redlines marked against the correct version. Chuck, to answer your question, the secondment language is in Schedule A. The text as proposed by Sidley in the 7 September draft was bracketed pending ICANN’s review. ICANN has accepted the language and the brackets are removed in this 14 September draft. Thank you, Trang -----Original Message----- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 4:38 PM To: Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen@icann.org>, "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Cc: "cwg-client@icann.org" <cwg-client@icann.org>, Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner@icann.org> Subject: RE: Services Agreement
Thanks Trang. Where was language added or changed regarding secondment?
Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Trang Nguyen Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 7:07 PM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Cc: cwg-client@icann.org; Samantha Eisner Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Services Agreement
All,
Sidley and ICANN have agreed on language for the two open items that we reported on last week¹s call, secondment and methodology for calculating the cost of the services. The language is reflected in Section 5 and Schedule A. Redline and clean versions are attached for your review.
Best,
Trang