I'm happy enough with this, too, for now, though I would as previously stated far prefer a firm line of business restriction that prevented this ever coming to pass. Jordan On 22 April 2015 at 17:41, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
I tend to agree with Avri on this as well.
Regards
sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 22 Apr 2015 02:52, "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
This seems good to me.
I still think this issue is out of scope for this effort, so not doing anything at this time is the right thing to do.
avri
On 21-Apr-15 14:59, Milton L Mueller wrote:
"Post transition there will only be the IANA Functions Operator and the Root Zone Maintainer. The CWG is not recommending any change in the separation between the two at this time. The CWG is recommending that should there be a proposal to combine the two or make other changes in their respective roles in root zone modification, that it be subject to wide community consultation."
------------------------------ [image: Avast logo] <http://www.avast.com/>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-- Jordan Carter Chief Executive *InternetNZ* 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob) jordan@internetnz.net.nz Skype: jordancarter *A better world through a better Internet *