Good morning: (a) most of what CWG is dealing with has 'policy' implications. (b) the GNSO track record on competition and conflict of interest is not convincing. Regards CW PS: The author of the 'detailed description' (who?) appears to have encapsulated the issue quite clearly. On 25 Feb 2015, at 01:10, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> wrote:
Looks like a policy issue to me Christopher, moreover a GNSO policy issue.
Chuck
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Wilkinson Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 1:37 PM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Stewardship; Bernard Turcotte Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Design team proposals - competition and conflict of interest
Good evening:
Please find attached a proposal for a Design Team to address conflicts of interest and competition/anti.-trust aspects of the IANA transition. Thankyou for a very relevant "Detailed Description" of this group, already supplied.
Regards
CW
On 20 Feb 2015, at 19:32, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
A reminder that we are looking forward to receiving your suggestions for Design Teams to address specific issues for the CWG Transition proposal.
Please forward your suggestions to the list as soon as possible.
Bernard (for Lise).
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship