Dear members of the CWG Stewardship, Below, please find the meeting notes from the IOTF Call #6. The presentation material, transcript, and audio recordings are now posted at https://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation under "Meetings & Work Sessions" section. Unfortunately due to technical issue, the AdobeConnect room recording was not completed though the recording was started at the beginning of the call. We are working with IT to identify the issue to avoid this from happening on the future calls. My apology for this inconvenience. ***Meeting Notes*** Implementation Oversight Task Force (ITOF) call #6 20 April 2016 @ 19:00 UTC Please note that this meeting is being recorded. To mute or Unmute, select *6 (Star-Six) If you would like to review the last call(s), the recordings and presentation materials are posted publicly here: https://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation Agenda: 1. Opening Remarks 2. Implementation Items PTI Formation Document Review process IANA Escalation Mechanisms 3. AOB Paul Kane's question RZMA question 4. Closing Remarks Notes: PTI Formation documents are: - Bylaws - Articles of Incorporation - Conflict of Interest Policy Action Items: - Share Document Review Process & Timeline slide with Client Committee to discuss their involvement and Sidley's. (ICANN) - Share PTI formation documents term sheets with Client Committee (and potentially with Sidley). (ICANN) - IANA CS Complaint Resolution Process - is the CEO step no longer part of the process? Chuck will look into the question raised and get back to this group via the email list. (Chuck Gomes) - IANA Problem Resolution Process - Annex J - Flowchart 1 and 3 have the same title but one swimlane different. Chuck will look into it and get back to this group via the email list. (Chuck Gomes) - Section 7 & 8 of annex C: could be included in the ICANN Bylaws, PTI bylaws or in the ICANN-PTI contract. ICANN to flag this item with lawyers to make sure it gets included. (ICANN) - Share the rough timeline of implementation item documents during the next call (ICANN) - Review the ICANN Bylaws for the mentioning of the ICANN-PTI contract (ICANN) ***Chat History*** James Gannon: Will we have audio in the AC room for the call? James Gannon: Yup can hear Lise Fuhr: Good evening Chuck Gomes: I am 3200. Allan MacGillivray: Tht's me at 5335 Paul Kane: To be clear there will there be PTI Bylaws as it is a seperate affilaite company Paul Kane: ? Alissa Cooper: What section of the bylaws will the PTI Purpose be drawn from? Jonathan Robinson: Apologeis for late arrival Jonathan Robinson: Had a minor IT glitch Nathalie Vergnolle: Yes, there will be separate PTI bylaws Paul Kane: Thanks Nathalie Yuko Green: @Alissa, that would be are covered in Section 16.2 and Annex D (Articles 1 &2). Lise Fuhr: Thank you Trang Yuko Green: @Alissa, the language was circulated via IOTF mail on 15 April Alissa Cooper: ok, thanks, will find it matthew shears: + 1 Paul on PTI bylaws Paul Kane: Agree Trang Paul Kane: This group is here to help you get it right then it needs ratification by the groups CWG/SO etc matthew shears: agree bylaws and AoI should go to Sidley matthew shears: + 1 Chuck Paul Kane: Chuck agree Greg Shatan: With my clilent committee hat on, I'm happy to step in to the review at that point, suggeted by Chuck. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): agree totally Jonathan Jonathan Robinson: Reminder of the role of client committee. Not a committee to take decisions but to facilitate effective interaction with the lawyers to ensure that we use them efficiently / cost-effectively. Lise Fuhr: @Jonathan agree Avri Doria: wasn't this the CSC group. matthew shears: seems unusual that it would go to GDD James Gannon: Agree Matt Donna Austin, Neustar: @Avri, wasn't what the CSC group? matthew shears: PTYI BOard is not on the escalation path in the slide Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): hmmm matthew shears: PTI Board would come after the IANA functions manager as the IANA functions manager is on the PTI Board if I recall correctly Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): that resonates Matthrw Donna Austin, Neustar: This is for individual complaints Jonathan Robinson: What does the reference CWG 1367 mean? Paul Kane: How long wil this take? If there is a problem there needs to be a quick fix ..... Avri Doria: i guess i am missing the problem here. this seems to accurately reflect stage 1. Avri Doria: i do not think it was an omission James Gannon: Its actually para 367 in our proosal Johnathan James Gannon: *proposal Avri Doria: 1367 Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): the proposed Yuko Green: 1367 refers to the paragraph number from ICG proposal Jonathan Robinson: Thanks Yuko. I was looking for the reference in the original CWG proposal matthew shears: If this is for individuals the proposed escalation path on the screen makes sense matthew shears: (not the current one) Paul Kane: Today there is GDD - but tomorrow there will be PTI Board Yuko Green: @jonathan, that would be paragraph 367 from CWG proposal Jonathan Robinson: Thank-you Yukp Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): yes Avri thus the *proposed* Alan Greenberg: I have no problem with the ICANN CEO being removed. Was just curious that it was there today. Paul Kane: Agree Avri .... no longer there Donna Austin, Neustar: @Alan - I think it is at the complainant's discretion to take their complaint to the ICANN President & CEO, something anyone can do, not just as it relates to IANA Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): THX Chuck matthew shears: + 1 Avri and + 1 Paul on speed and efficiency Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): agree Donna Paul Kane: Donna - redelegation will (likely) be settled in Court - but technical operations need to involve The Managemnt of PTI- ie the Board Avri Doria: agree with Donna and that is a reasonable option James Gannon: Yes for emercengy technical issues there is the 24x7 escalation process Avri Doria: i think the right hand table corresponds to what we included in the plan. James Gannon: +1 Avri Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): YUP Donna Austin, Neustar: I think the short answer to Trang's quesiton is there was no oversight. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): I will say again *the proposal* Allan MacGillivray: +1 Jonathan on agreeing to the current CWG proposal (right hand chart) and moving on. The IANA Functions Manager can always discuss this with the CEO. So, let's move on. Avri Doria: while the PRI may be a service provider to GDD, i did not think the IFPM would be a report of the GDD president except in so far as the GDD prez is on PTI board. Avri Doria: ... PTI ... Avri Doria: they wanted to be sure there was no oversight. good due dillgence. Donna Austin, Neustar: @Alan, it was an example Donna Austin, Neustar: a bad one, but just an example. Paul Kane: ccTLD are not ICANN - they are local and IANA confirm local and report to ICANN Alan Greenberg: @Donna, yes, but one that I tdon't think is possible, so was curious if I was missing something. Alan Greenberg: @Paul, yes, but ultimately IANA only takes action after action of the ICANN Board - today. Alan Greenberg: ICANN Boardpresumably verifying that local issues meet RFC Donna Austin, Neustar: @Alan, I was looking for examples at short notice and used a bad one. Paul Kane: ICANN verify that the ransfer is correct (ie Registrants have been safely transferred) - ie stability of the ccTLD users Paul Kane: Secure and stability of the DNS ..... Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): Alan reefer back nee to the FOI for Delegations lokking to both RFC 1591 and the GAC Priciples relsting to Delegations Alan Greenberg: @Donna :-) Paul Kane: Bylaws... makes most sense... Thanks James Gannon: Para 264 for refernce Paul Kane: Thanks Trang Donna Austin, Neustar: I have to drop from the call. thanks all Alissa Cooper: I have a different question to ask under AOB, if we have time Lise Fuhr: I have to leave at the top of the hour Paul Kane: Note taker - It is ICANN Bylaws and also PTI bylaws matthew shears: + 1 Alissa - both sets of bylaws are key Yuko Green: @Paul, thank you Paul Kane: THanks .... Yuko ( remove Either) Paul Kane: Thasnk Yuko Green: Thank you Paul James Gannon: I dont think that the CCWG would provide much control over ICANNs ability to create and modify contracts Alissa Cooper: it is currently referenced in 1.1(d), but not for the effect that Chuck was describing James Gannon: Unless the wording was places directly into the bylaws and not just a reference James Gannon: +1 Paul James Gannon: Yes that it being done in other areas Paul Kane: Thanks all James Gannon: thanks all Jonathan Robinson: Thank-you Trang Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): Thnks everyone...Bye Greg Shatan: Bye all! Yuko Green Strategic Programs Manager Global Domains Division Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct Line: +1 310 578 8693 Mobile: +1 310 745 1517 E-mail: <mailto:yuko.green@icann.org> yuko.green@icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> www.icann.org