Hi all, Just a quick update to let you know that the action items are either completed or in progress. Kim Davies will attend the CWG working session and the Chairs will consider this as they develop the agenda for the meeting. Best, Grace From: Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org> Date: Monday, February 2, 2015 6:16 PM To: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript RFP3 - 02 FEB 21:00 UTC Dear all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the RFP3 on 02 FEB are available here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52232288 Action Items Action: Chat and discussion with Kim Davies on what IANA does (day-to-day) - Ask Kim to attend CWG session - Ask Chairs to allocate time on agenda to discuss how IANA works - Encourage all to attend Wednesday IANA session: http://singapore52.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-iana <http://singapore52.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-iana> - Schedule Kim to be on our call post-SG Notes 2/2: Questions-focused meeting! Strickling questions: Questions are part of his remarks here: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/speechtestimony/2015/remarks-assistant-secretary-str ickling-state-net-conference-1272015 <http://www.ntia.doc.gov/speechtestimony/2015/remarks-assistant-secretary-st rickling-state-net-conference-1272015> Question 1 · Yes, it's an over-complication -- Paul Kane · Yes, it's an unknown, a risk -- Cheryl Langdon-Orr (ALAC) · Any change will have risks, so we need to understand them and mitigate them -- Avri Doria · The lesser risk is potentially the "internal to ICANN" solution -- Donna Austin · General agreement that there are risks on both sides (internal / external) · Need for legal counsel -- John Poole Question 2 This question is about the authorization function Question 3 Yes, purpose of RFP3b Question 4 Too early to answer Authorization function · Role that NTIA performs needs to be replaced (Donna Austin) · In the past, there was no authorization function (Paul Kane) · Should be an automated process going forward (Paul Kane) · There needs to be some checks & balances for redelegation (Chris Disspain) · Need to be careful with a new entity in charge on authorization function (litigation risk) (Chris Disspain) · New role shouldn't exceed parameters of old role (Greg Shatan) Action: Chat and discussion with Kim Davies on what IANA does (day-to-day) - Ask Kim to attend CWG session - Ask Chairs to allocate time on agenda to discuss how IANA works - Encourage all to attend Wednesday IANA session: http://singapore52.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-iana <http://singapore52.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-iana> - Schedule Kim to be on our call post-SG Questions to be added to the draft · How walled off is the IANA Function? · What level of separability is desirable? · Do you want to see this transition happen? why or why not? · As the registrants, registrars and registries that pay for the IANA operation do you care how much it costs? do you care how much it actually costs to support the IANA function for protocols and numbers? · Are we comfortable with ICANN as policy-maker as the IANA operator (policy-implementer) without external oversight? · We also have to start thinking about how the current ICANN centric policy making process would work in the event that a new IANA operator were chosen. For example, should ICANN determine that there should be another round of new gTLTDs, how would we ensure that the new operator would accept this? · how about what does functional separation mean to you? · what solution path has not been thought of yet by the CWG? · Should the primary customers have a weighted say in which proposal is acceptable?
