As you would probably guess my previous comment Milton, I disagree. It is not perfect but for me I find it helpful. Anyone who doesn’t find it helpful can ignore it. Chuck From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 10:47 AM To: Bernard Turcotte; cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Comment summary for Wednesday December 3rd Appreciate the attempt but I am not sure this is a good idea. If this public comment period is like every one I have ever seen before, 90% of the comments will come on the day of the deadline or perhaps a day before. The running log therefore kind of privileges early comments as they trickle in. Then we will be hit with a deluge at the end anyway. Might be better to look at all comments after they all come in. From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org]<mailto:[mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org]> On Behalf Of Bernard Turcotte Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 9:35 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Comment summary for Wednesday December 3rd All, This will be part of a daily log of public comments to assist us on in keeping track of the various postings. Comments on how to improve this welcome. B., For December 2nd we have the following: Date From Summary 20141202 Page Howe Current system with NTIA is doing a good job and wants it maintained. 20141202 Graham Schreiber Garbled paste into body of comment 20141202 Graham Schreiber Refers to a US supreme court case about .com (?) involving a number of parties including ICANN and suggesting that the transition work not proceed until this is resolved. A cumulative of these summaries is provided as an Excel file - attached. B.