March 2, 2015
3:21 p.m.
I actually agree with Seun on both of these points. In particular D and F should be consolidated. E seems redundant. --MM - Why do we need a design team E (SAC 69) isn't that the role of RFP-4? Perhaps i miss-understood the purpose of the DT as i thought their work is largely to build-up RFP-3 response. - I think DT "D" and "F" are almost related OR at least "D" can be a subsection of "F" especially since D is a matter of answering the Yes or No question and if yes then it goes over to F