All, Please note that the documents attached do not contain the latest version of paragraph 4.7 as proposed by Paul Kane so that final change will need to be agreed and incorporated. I understand that 4.7 is likely to be acceptable to ICANN in the latest form. Jonathan From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info] Sent: 08 September 2016 08:46 To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: FW: [client com] Action items from last CWG Call and next call agenda All, Please see the following and attached in advance of our call later today. Jonathan (on behalf of the Client Committee) From: Hofheimer, Joshua T. [mailto:jhofheimer@sidley.com] Sent: 08 September 2016 06:54 To: Yuko Green <yuko.green@icann.org <mailto:yuko.green@icann.org> >; Client Committee <cwg-client@icann.org <mailto:cwg-client@icann.org> > Cc: Resnick, Yael <yresnick@sidley.com <mailto:yresnick@sidley.com> >; Flanagan, Sharon <sflanagan@sidley.com <mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com> >; Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory@sidley.com <mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com> >; jrobinson@afilias.info <mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info> ; 'Lise Fuhr' <lise.fuhr@difo.dk <mailto:lise.fuhr@difo.dk> >; Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com> > Subject: RE: [client com] Action items from last CWG Call and next call agenda Dear Client Committee, Attached please find the following documents in advance of the call tomorrow (7 attachments total): 1. Naming Functions Agreement – Clean and Redline marked against the last version shared with CWG on August 31. 2. Draft Comment Letter from the CWG Co-Chairs to accompany the posting of the Naming Function Agreement redline in the public comment period. 3. Services Agreement – Clean and Redline against ICANN’s initial draft. 4. Letter of Instruction to ICANN re the Community Agreement – Clean and Track Change Redline showing the changes proposed by Greg Shatan to the prior Sidley draft, and some additional edits by Sidley on top of Greg’s. Regarding the Letter of Instruction: * We agree with the additional revisions proposed by Greg to emphasize the decision-making authority of the CCG Representatives of the Names Community, rather than ICANN, with respect to the limited activity contemplated under the Community Agreement. * As noted by Sidley previously, and discussed and agreed on the Client Committee call two weeks ago, though the CWG is not a legal entity, it has been acting on behalf of the chartering organizations for some time now, and using this letter may be the most efficient approach to facilitate the transition. This is especially true if ICANN enters into the letter and agrees to be bound by its terms, which presumably could be enforced by the EC through removal of the ICANN Board if something egregious happened in the future. * We incorporated the definition of the Names Community, but added a modification to enable affirmation pre- or post-transition by the various SO/ACs. This would help manage the difficult timing that the CWG faces now in September. * Based on prior discussions among the CWG members and our own review of the legal issues, on balance it does not appear to us to add much value to have the CWG organize itself into a legal, unincorporated association just for the purpose of instructing ICANN to sign the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. Leaving aside the practical question whether the members and stakeholders want CWG to survive, if CWG were to become a legal entity, then it also could sign the Community Agreement directly on behalf of the Names Community, rather than insert ICANN as an intermediary. Finally, aside from finalizing the above drafts, the three CCG Representatives (one of whom will also be named the co-chair from Names) still need to be selected for the Community Agreement. Thank you and speak with you tomorrow. Cheers, Josh Joshua Hofheimer Sidley Austin LLP jhofheimer@sidley.com <mailto:jhofheimer@sidley.com> (213) 896-6061 (LA direct) (650) 565-7561 (Palo Alto direct) (323) 708-2405 (cell) From: Yuko Green [mailto:yuko.green@icann.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 2:37 PM To: Hofheimer, Joshua T.; Client Committee Cc: Resnick, Yael; Flanagan, Sharon; Gregory, Holly; jrobinson@afilias.info <mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info> ; 'Lise Fuhr'; Greg Shatan Subject: RE: [client com] Action items from last CWG Call and next call agenda Thank you Josh for the updates. We will await for your e-mail with updated documents from later today. Regards, Yuko From: Hofheimer, Joshua T. [mailto:jhofheimer@sidley.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 1:27 PM To: Yuko Green <yuko.green@icann.org <mailto:yuko.green@icann.org> >; Client Committee <cwg-client@icann.org <mailto:cwg-client@icann.org> > Cc: Resnick, Yael <yresnick@sidley.com <mailto:yresnick@sidley.com> >; Flanagan, Sharon <sflanagan@sidley.com <mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com> >; Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory@sidley.com <mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com> >; jrobinson@afilias.info <mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info> ; 'Lise Fuhr' <lise.fuhr@difo.dk <mailto:lise.fuhr@difo.dk> >; Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com> > Subject: RE: [client com] Action items from last CWG Call and next call agenda Yuko – We are working with ICANNon some final proposed revisions and should be able to circulate revised drafts of the Naming Function Agreement and Services Agreement, and issues list if needed, sometime today. We also are going to be sending a revised draft of the instruction letter with a few edits on top of the draft Greg circulated earlier. Unfortunately, I am only going to be available tomorrow for the first hour, so perhaps we can cover any open items on the Naming Function Agreement and Services Agreement in that time period. Sharon will also be on the call, and either of us can assist with discussion of the Instruction Letter and Names Community definition (with Sharon leading if it spills into the second hour). Cheers, Josh Joshua Hofheimer Sidley Austin LLP jhofheimer@sidley.com <mailto:jhofheimer@sidley.com> (213) 896-6061 (LA direct) (650) 565-7561 (Palo Alto direct) (323) 708-2405 (cell) From: cwg-client-bounces@icann.org <mailto:cwg-client-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:cwg-client-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Yuko Green Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 1:17 PM To: Client Committee Subject: Re: [client com] Action items from last CWG Call and next call agenda Dear Sidley team, I am following up on below e-mail, as we have a CWG meeting scheduled for tomorrow at 14:00 UTC. Regards, Yuko From: cwg-client-bounces@icann.org <mailto:cwg-client-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:cwg-client-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Yuko Green Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 1:08 PM To: Client Committee <cwg-client@icann.org <mailto:cwg-client@icann.org> > Subject: [client com] Action items from last CWG Call and next call agenda Dear Sidley team, On behalf of the CWG Co-Chairs, I am following up on 2 action items from the last CWG calls: * (ICANN Legal / Sidley): provide CWG with a revised version of the Naming functions agreement including today's points before next CWG call. --> Will the redline and CWG comment submission letter be ready to be distributed to the CWG prior to the Thursday’s call? * (Sidley): propose some revised language [for definition of Names community for the IANA IPR agreement] on the basis of the feedback received by the group today. --> Will this be ready to be distributed to the CQG prior to the Thursday’s call? For your reference, here is the agenda for this Thursday’s CWG meeting (08 September @ 14:00 UTC): 1. Status Update (Chairs) 2. Implementation Update * Staff update 3. Key Issues (with Sidley) * Naming Functions Agreement * Services Agreement * IANA IPR 4. Client Committee 5. AOB Regards, Yuko Green Strategic Programs Manager Global Domains Division Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct Line: +1 310 578 8693 Mobile: +1 310 745 1517 E-mail: <mailto:yuko.green@icann.org> yuko.green@icann.org <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org_&d=DQMFAg&...> www.icann.org **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. ****************************************************************************************************