Dear All, Please see the attached Naming Functions Agreement which the comments from Sidley. We have a CWG call on Thursday where we can discuss the issues raised by Sidley. Best, Lise From: cwg-client-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-client-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Hofheimer, Joshua T. Sent: 26 July 2016 03:20 To: Client Committee Cc: Greeley, Amy E. Subject: Re: [client com] ICANN-PTI Naming Functions Agreement & Services Agreement Headers Client Committee -- Attached is a further revised draft of Sidley’s comments to the Naming Functions Agreement. For convenience, we have included a clean Word version, a cumulative PDF redline against the ICANN draft, and an internal redline against the version we sent yesterday. Please note, we have not undertaken a formal review of the Naming Functions Agreement against Annex C. We are looking for guidance from the CWG as to whether the provisions that the CWG drafted to implement Annex C (as described in the Implementation Proposal dated June 9, 2016) will be incorporated in the bylaws or the naming function agreement. Once this determination is made, we can ensure that the provisions are appropriately documented, if requested. Cheers, Josh Joshua Hofheimer Sidley Austin LLP jhofheimer@sidley.com (213) 896-6061 (LA direct) (650) 565-7561 (Palo Alto direct) (323) 708-2405 (cell) From: Hofheimer, Joshua T. Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 12:50 PM To: 'Client Committee' Cc: Resnick, Yael; Flanagan, Sharon; Gregory, Holly; Grapsas, Rebecca; Greeley, Amy E. Subject: RE: ICANN-PTI Naming Functions Agreement & Services Agreement Headers Dear Client Committee – If you have not already started reviewing the attached, please hold for a few hours. We will have a revised draft to you shortly with further observations on the connections to the ICANN Bylaws, and some additional revisions. Thanks, Josh Joshua Hofheimer Sidley Austin LLP jhofheimer@sidley.com<mailto:jhofheimer@sidley.com> (213) 896-6061 (LA direct) (650) 565-7561 (Palo Alto direct) (323) 708-2405 (cell) From: Hofheimer, Joshua T. Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 4:02 PM To: Client Committee Cc: Resnick, Yael; Flanagan, Sharon; Gregory, Holly; Grapsas, Rebecca; Greeley, Amy E. Subject: ICANN-PTI Naming Functions Agreement & Services Agreement Headers Dear Client Committee, Attached please find proposed comments to the Naming Functions Agreement and the Services Agreement Headers, both clean and marked against the versions sent by ICANN. Because the Services Agreement Headers received from ICANN was in PDF only, we converted to Word and added formatting. However, this has made the redline look more atrocious than it actually is. We are going to try to clean this up a little in the versions to go to ICANN, but did not want to delay getting feedback or comments from the community. On the Naming Functions Agreement, we focused primarily on verifying the mapping exercise undertaken by ICANN to ensure the CWG’s views and conditions have been incorporated. Where the proposed draft appears to be lacking or inconsistent, we have noted with questions, comments, and in some instances direct revisions. Cheers, Josh JOSHUA T. HOFHEIMER Partner SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP +1 650 565 7561 (PA direct) +1 213 896 6061 (LA direct) +1 323 708 2405 (Cell) jhofheimer@sidley.com<mailto:jhofheimer@sidley.com> www.sidley.com<http://www.sidley.com> [Image removed by sender. SIDLEY] **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. ****************************************************************************************************
