Hi Olivier, You have the correct Wiki page. Staff has not yet produced an updated DT Status because we have been focusing on pulling together the draft proposal and waiting on more updates for DT-A and DT-F today. You are more than welcome to update the page/document if you would like we could use the help! Talk to you later, Grace From: Olivier Crépin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> Date: Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 8:40 AM To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org>, "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Cc: Paul Kane <Paul.Kane@icb.co.uk> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Agenda for meeting 41 on Thursday 16/04 at 17:00 UTC Dear Marika, thank you very much for this reassuring update. I gather the page on https://community.icann.org/x/qgwnAw will be updated accordingly? Or am I looking at the wrong page? Kindest regards, Olivier On 16/04/2015 13:17, Marika Konings wrote:
Olivier, per the notes of meeting #38: Priority 2 DTs
· Chairs have reassessed priority two items · DT G - Chairs recommend that this dealt with through dialogue with other communities as it is not limited to naming community. Should there be an IPR issue that is naming specific, the CWG would obtain input from the legal advisors. Call has been scheduled with chairs of CRISP team to co-ordinate, not only on this issue but also broader conversations. · DT H (.INT) - Chairs understand that this issue is being dealt with by the GAC - await GAC input. · DT I (competition policy & conflict of interest) - CWG chairs consider that this issue is adequately addressed by DT C. Furthermore, legal advisors have provided input on antitrust matters. If needed, additional guidance could be sought from the legal advisors concerning best practices governance guidance. No need for a DT. · DT J (confidentiality & perception of conflict of interest) - CWG chairs consider that this issue is adequately addressed by DT C. Furthermore, legal advisors have provided input on antitrust matters. If needed, additional guidance could be sought from the legal advisors concerning best practices governance guidance. No need for a DT. · DT K (OFAC) - issue is being dealt with by ICANN as a whole. Proposed language will be circulated that should cover this commitment.
Best regards,
Marika
From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> Date: Thursday 16 April 2015 13:12 To: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org>, "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Cc: Paul Kane <Paul.Kane@icb.co.uk> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Agenda for meeting 41 on Thursday 16/04 at 17:00 UTC
Dear Chairs,
thanks for this agenda. Would you please be so kind to let us know about the status all priority 2 DTs hence DT G-K? Kindest regards,
Olivier
On 16/04/2015 11:59, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
Dear all,
Below is the agenda for meeting 41 on Thursday 16/04 at 17:00 UTC.
Agenda: 1. Opening Remarks / Recap of High Intensity Meeting 2. Update on communications with CCWG-Accountability 3. Update from Client Committee (Greg) 4. Outcome of combined DT-C; DT-M; DT-N call 5. DT-A recommendations (Paul) 6. DT-F recommendations (Alan) 7. DT-X recommendations and suggested incorporation (Avri) 8. Action plan leading to Public Comment 9. AOB 10. (a) Update on principles 11. (b) Other 12. Closing
Best, Grace
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html