Dear Milton almost is important to understand what is the basis of your comment, but is your decision share with us your opinion. Yours, Erick
El 2/12/2014, a las 12:00, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> escribió:
Desiree: So, according to you, the lawyer (counsel) who authorizes delegations/redelegations would be provided by the ccNSO? Or from some other “group of ccTLDs”? what if the ccNSO lawyer had one opinion and the lawyer provided by another group had a different opinion? Not criticizing, just trying to understand what is being proposed.
Erick: My opinion of the legal status of a ccTLD is not relevant to answering those questions. I repeat: I am not criticizing the proposal, I am just trying to understand what is being proposed.
From: Desiree Miloshevic [mailto:dmiloshevic@afilias.info <mailto:dmiloshevic@afilias.info>] Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:51 AM To: Milton L Mueller Cc: CWG Stewardship Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] authorization function for ccTLDs
Milton
Before you respond to Erick - I'll just say add that, for example, the ccNSO FOIWG worked on interpretation of RFC 1591 and other IANA related policy guidelines. http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/foi-final-07oct14-en.pdf <http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/foi-final-07oct14-en.pdf>
My understanding is that bodies like the ccNSO or group of ccTLDs are there to develop policies regarding the delegation and redelegation of ccTLDs. It's my personal view that it could potentially form such a council in future and give opinions. (independent of ICANN board).
Desiree --
On 2 Dec 2014, at 15:30, Erick Iriarte <eiriarte@iriartelaw.com <mailto:eiriarte@iriartelaw.com>> wrote:
Milton to understand better your message and position: for you exactly what is the legal status of a cctld ? Erick
El 2/12/2014, a las 10:16, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu <mailto:mueller@syr.edu>> escribió:
I have some questions regarding this:
"The CWG is considering replacing the authorization role, at least with regard to ccTLDs, with a written opinion from counsel (independent of ICANN) that each delegation and re-delegation request meets the policy requirements cited in the publicly posted reports."
Where would this counsel come from? Whose counsel is it if it is independent of ICANN and ICANN is supplying the IANA service? Since most of the policy requirements related to ccTLD delegation/redelegation are not laws, but things like RFC 1591, on what basis is the counsel's opinion made? Precedent?
Milton L. Mueller Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor Syracuse University School of Information Studies http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/mueller/Home.html <http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/mueller/Home.html>
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship>
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship>
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship>
Erick Iriarte Área de Derecho de Nuevas Tecnologias IRIARTE & ASOCIADOS Dirección: Miró Quesada 191, of. 510, Lima 01, Perú Telefax: (+511) 2035400 Sitio web: iriartelaw.com Twitter: @ialaw Facebook: facebook.com/ialaw Por favor antes de imprimir piense en nuestro medio ambiente, una hoja puede hacer la diferencia en un bosque. Please, before printing, think of our environment, a leaf can make a difference in a forest. Declaracion de Confidencialidad El contenido de este mensaje de correo electronico y de sus archivos adjuntos esta(n) dirigido(s) exclusivamente a el(los) destinatario(s) del mismo. Adicionalmente, este mensaje y su contenido pueden ser privilegiados y estar cubiertos por la reserva profesional entre abogado y cliente. Si usted no es el destinatario indicado, o si este mensaje le ha sido enviado por error, queda advertido en el sentido de no leer, divulgar, reproducir, distribuir, diseminar o utilizar este mensaje en forma alguna. La entrega de este mensaje a cualquier persona diferente del(de los) destinatario(s) a quien(es) se ha dirigido no constituye una renuncia de privilegios o confidencialidad. Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por favor advierta al remitente mediante correo de respuesta; adicionalmente le solicitamos que inmediatamente proceda a suprimir este mensaje y sus archivos adjuntos, si los hubiere. Statement of Confidentiality The contents of this e-mail message and its attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) hereof. In addition, this e-mail transmission may be confidential and it may be subject to privilege protecting communications between attorneys or solicitors and their clients. If you are not the named addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are directed not to read, disclose, reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this e-mail. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege or confidentiality. If you have received this transmission in error, please alert the sender by reply e-mail; we also request that you immediately delete this message and its attachments, if any. Please, before printing, think of our environment, a leaf can make a difference in a forest.