Is there a report from DT-H? --MM
-----Original Message----- From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca] Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 7:48 PM To: Milton L Mueller; Andrew Sullivan; cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Fate of the .INT domain
Milton, I do appreciate the leadership role you are playing, but I note (from https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Design+Teams+List ):
Design Team H: .INT Operations
Lead: Elise Lindeberg
Status: Not Needed/Covered Elsewhere
Note: Priority 2 - Chairs understand that this issue is being dealt with by the GAC.
Alan
At 17/05/2015 06:12 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
Yes, Andrew to your credit you've been consistent about this. But I have also been consistent in advocating that we fix whatever needs fixing during this process. ;-)
--MM
-----Original Message-----
Right, that's my point. There is nothing wrong with a transition plan that says of int, "Status quo ante, nothing to see here." Which is I think what is being suggested. That doesn't mean I think it should never be changed, but I don't see why it needs to be linked to this, any more than I think SLA changes or other not strictly relevant operational adjustments ought to be included.
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship