I think the IANA transition is a "game changer" which can transform the accoutability mechanism,make policy-making,implementing and monitoring seperated each other. Althought the final proposal has yet to processing,it will have to be commercially viable. At 2015-04-27 19:54:48, "Seun Ojedeji" <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote: Forwarding this to the CWG as I think it's useful and relevant. Cheers! sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> Date: 27 Apr 2015 03:18 Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Board workshop presentations associated with the IANA transition To: "accountability-cross-community@icann.org" <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Cc: Hello All, At the Board workshop in Los Angeles yesterday we received a briefing from • Andrew Sullivan, (IAB) • Jonathan Robinson, Co-Chair, CWG-Stewardship and GNSO Chair • Jari Arkko, ICG Member and IETF Chair • Izumi Okutani, Chair, CRISP Team • Axel Pawlik, NRO Chair on the status of their work on the proposals for the IANA transition. The briefings were recorded and transcribed, and are available at: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/board-workshop-community-panel-intro-2... I have attached the transcript. If the CCWG would like to brief the Board prior to Buenos Aires, I can arrange for that. I will also coordinate a response from the Board to the CCWG report as part of the public comment process. Regards, Bruce Tonkin _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community