Dear Jonathan and Alissa, I have a question about process here: how are the ICG and the CWG treating comments that fall outside a public consultation period? Are these receiving special treatment and if so, why? I note the CWG has just opened a public consultation period - should these comment have gone into the CWG consultation rather than using this seemingly special track? Kindest regards, Olivier On 28/07/2015 11:54, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
Alissa,
Thank-you for this, please do go ahead and send the ICG thoughts on this through to the CWG.
Jonathan
*From:*Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa@cooperw.in] *Sent:* 27 July 2015 16:39 *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org IANA <cwg-stewardship@icann.org> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Comments from Richard Hill
CWG,
The ICG has received the following from Richard Hill: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/icg-forum_ianacg.org/2015-June/000001.html> According to the process the ICG uses to handle forum comments <https://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/Community-Comments-Handling-1May1...>, the ICG assesses whether the comments are to be investigated by the operational community itself, and if we draw that conclusion we make the OC aware of the comment and ask whether the OC has any input. So we would appreciate input you may have no later than August 10.
The ICG has also reviewed these questions in light of the CWG charter and process, and we would be happy to send our thoughts if helpful to the CWG.
Thanks,
Alissa Cooper on behalf of the ICG
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship