Hi Andrew I think you are misreading. the IANA operator is either: a) accountable to the NTIA via the SLA, or b) accountable to the naming community via the SLE. So delay in finalising the SLE just delays the date of transition from NTIA. The concept of running in parallel scheduled to start on 1st January with a test phase of IANA operations (without NTIA oversight)...... Best Paul Quoting Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:42:33PM +0000, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
Andrew If I am not mistaken, this is a settled issue. Did this group decide to revise the SLE or did it not? I am under the impression that it did. It undermines the process when people try to use snafus to reinsert a non-consensus position into the outcome.
I'm not trying to insert anything. My reading of Annex H is that the text says that the plan is part of implementation and is running in parallel. Therefore, if it takes a few more months, it's not the end of the world; and we can proceed with the transition without it being completely sorted. What am I misreading?
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship