Thanks Jonathan. Chuck From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:41 PM To: Gomes, Chuck; cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] IANA IPR Thanks Chuck, Good point. I think it will make sense for a small group to draft the responses for subsequent review by the IOTF and/or CWG in a similar process to how we dealt with the bylaws work. It does seem logical to me that the client committee take on this work in conjunction with the consultation with Sidley but we haven't explicit discussed doing so. Jonathan From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com] Sent: 22 June 2016 17:59 To: jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>; cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] IANA IPR Thanks Jonathan. Am I correct in assuming that the Client Committee will draft responses to the questions / issues raised by Sidley? Chuck From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 9:36 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] IANA IPR All, The IANA IPR group (Greg Shatan, Lise Fuhr & myself) from the CWG had a meeting with colleagues from the other two IANA operational communities. Greg & I attended. Lise was unable to but we have discussed it since. We picked up on the relatively recently Sidley advice and considered the issues arising and next steps. Essentially, we agreed on at least the following actions: 1. The key questions and issues arising from the Sidley review of the Principal Terms need to be organised, reviewed and dealt with. CWG Stewardship (Names) will tabulate these for ease of processing. Issues needing resolution by CWG only will be dealt with by CWG. Issues needing resolution by all three operations communities will be referred back to the IANA IPR group. 2. We will utilise ICANN project management staff to track the key issues and integrate this (IANA IPR) stream of work into the overall project tracking and reporting. 3. It will be useful to meet face to face in Helsinki if possible. 4. Draft agreements for three licences of the IPR are being prepared by IETF Trust legal counsel. These will be sent this group for review once drafted. Now, the Sidley input does not immediately give us in the CWG the ability to move forward without reviewing it properly and agreeing the actions required. Accordingly, we propose to take two actions within the CWG in the short term. A. Tabulate the advice given and commence drafting answers or responses to the questions / issues raised B. Client Committee meet with Sidley (after ICANN Helsinki) to discuss the input and seek to reconcile it with the views and positions shared by the other operational communities. Please indicate if you have any concerns with this approach. Thank-you, Jonathan