Surely we could recommend that ICANN divest itself of .int within a x year period after the transition? I seem to recall there was a strong interest from the ITU in taking over .int at some point in the past, but has not re-emerged in anything I have seen for several years. I thought it might have been formally proposed by ITU during the NOI and FNOI stages of the NTIA / IANA renewal process. ITU made submissions, but the submissions did not refer to .int iirc. Cheers Keith On 18/05/2015 10:10 a.m., Milton L Mueller wrote:
I care. That's the kind of thing we should do - at least propose to ask them and initiate a process to change it if they want to.
-----Original Message-----
Hi,
Do we have any idea of what the .int 2nd level registrants want? Do we care?
avri
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship .