All, The IANA IPR group (Greg Shatan, Lise Fuhr & myself) from the CWG had a meeting with colleagues from the other two IANA operational communities. Greg & I attended. Lise was unable to but we have discussed it since. We picked up on the relatively recently Sidley advice and considered the issues arising and next steps. Essentially, we agreed on at least the following actions: 1. The key questions and issues arising from the Sidley review of the Principal Terms need to be organised, reviewed and dealt with. CWG Stewardship (Names) will tabulate these for ease of processing. Issues needing resolution by CWG only will be dealt with by CWG. Issues needing resolution by all three operations communities will be referred back to the IANA IPR group. 2. We will utilise ICANN project management staff to track the key issues and integrate this (IANA IPR) stream of work into the overall project tracking and reporting. 3. It will be useful to meet face to face in Helsinki if possible. 4. Draft agreements for three licences of the IPR are being prepared by IETF Trust legal counsel. These will be sent this group for review once drafted. Now, the Sidley input does not immediately give us in the CWG the ability to move forward without reviewing it properly and agreeing the actions required. Accordingly, we propose to take two actions within the CWG in the short term. A. Tabulate the advice given and commence drafting answers or responses to the questions / issues raised B. Client Committee meet with Sidley (after ICANN Helsinki) to discuss the input and seek to reconcile it with the views and positions shared by the other operational communities. Please indicate if you have any concerns with this approach. Thank-you, Jonathan