Thanks Trang I have been asking members of the ccTLD community for their guidance on the draft Agreement and to make sure they are satisfied with Annex C being incorporated. (I have yet to read the latest draft). Also the CWG asked that I seek clarification as to what was meant by the opening remarks in Section 1. The comments I received by email were: "Bottom line is the vast majority ccTLDs do not want to appoint ICANN in charge of their enteries in the ROOT zone - (some ccTLDs - around 10 have agreements with ICANN which does outline the relationship - such as .AU) but the 240+ others don't!" Where has this been respected/recognised please? I have subsequently been asked (as the original person advocating) by a different ccTLD Rep for a status report regarding the promised end-to-end automation for an updates to the Root Zone... I have said that this is not part of the transition and may occur later, but I'd welcome ICANN/IANA's response just to accurately convey the message to the ccTLD Community. Thanks Paul Quoting Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen@icann.org>:
All,
Please see attached a draft of the ICANN-PTI services agreement.
Best,
Trang