On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:31:16AM +0100, Paul M Kane - CWG wrote:
IANA Manager who told me that ICANN does not have the resources to identify their current RZM processes in terms of time taken for the SLE.
I don't think this should be too surprising. If I understand this report correctly, it's that Elise doesn't feel like she has the staff today to put them to work developing new measures to which ICANN will be bound contractually. That's different from measurements that they happen to be able to produce. If I were in her shoes, I'd probably say something similar. This is more or less why some of us argued months ago that changing one word of the current SLE was just asking for additional complication during the transition. Instead, as some of us argued previously, there should be a schedule for the implementation of new the SLE, which should happen after the transition. My opinion remains that staff should not be distracted in the run up to the transition by making any changes to what they measure or how they measure it, _regardless of_ how easy it would be for IANA to make the targets. Re-reading Annex H, I think there's still room to make things happen this way. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com