Dec. 1, 2014
4:53 p.m.
But still, I don't like the "or" in there. I thought the preponderance of opinion was very much in favor of fixed, recurring intervals and not only in the case of disastrous "performance deficiencies." --MM From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of on rereading the 1.6 version I see a function of the MRT (was PRT). o Managing a rebidding process in the case of performance deficiencies or at regular rebidding intervals; this comes real close to what I mean by Periodic RFPs. Was looking too narrowly for identical text instead of reading what was actually there. I think it is necessary and I am glad to see this there. apologies. avri