Kavouss this issue has been debated at length by Design Team O. I suggest you reach out to the design team to gain a better understanding of the CWGs path that has led to this requirement to get a full picture. -james From: <cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>> Date: Sunday 3 April 2016 at 10:02 p.m. To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>> Cc: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] [CCWG-ACCT] TR: Re: Implementation and Work Stream 2 role for CCWG-Accountability Seun Thanks for reply You are rushing into conclusions ENVISAGING A MULTI YEAR BUDGET IS ENTIRELY diffrent is blocking a three years Budget for PTI Regards Kavouss 2016-04-03 20:59 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>>: Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 3 Apr 2016 6:22 p.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>> wrote:
I am not in agreement to define a three years blocked budget
SO: Kavous, the act of defining a multi-year budget for PTI is an implementation item from the CWG proposal. Considering that the proposal has already been forwarded to NTIA, i believe you will agree that we have passed the stage of modifying what was proposed. Regards
Kavouss
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship