I must say that I find this level of bureaucracy totally unreasonable. This is not someone from outside the organization trying to get ICANN to reveal some secret, it is a properly chartered ICANN CWG trying to understand its task mandated by the Board. Alan At 22/12/2014 09:49 PM, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
Hi James, I understand that there is a tight timeline, but the person seeking the information should submit the request, not staff. --Grace
From: James Gannon <<mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net>james@cyberinvasion.net> Date: Monday, December 22, 2014 4:08 AM To: Grace Abuhamad <<mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>grace.abuhamad@icann.org>, "Gomes, Chuck" <<mailto:cgomes@verisign.com>cgomes@verisign.com>, Alan Greenberg <<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, Guru Acharya <<mailto:gurcharya@gmail.com>gurcharya@gmail.com>, Avri Doria <<mailto:avri@acm.org>avri@acm.org> Cc: "<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT
Hi Grace,
Given the tight timelines involved here could a member of staff manage/expedite a response on behalf of the chairs/CWG?
From: <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org>cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Grace Abuhamad Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 5:51 AM To: Gomes, Chuck; Alan Greenberg; Guru Acharya; Avri Doria Cc: <mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT
Dear all, For a more fulsome response to your questions on obtaining the Contingency Plan, please submit a request through ICANNs Documentary Information Disclosure Policy, available at <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/didp-2012-02-25-en>https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/didp-2012-02-25-en.
From: <Gomes>, Chuck <<mailto:cgomes@verisign.com>cgomes@verisign.com> Date: Thursday, December 18, 2014 4:55 AM To: Alan Greenberg <<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, Grace Abuhamad <<mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>grace.abuhamad@icann.org>, Guru Acharya <<mailto:gurcharya@gmail.com>gurcharya@gmail.com>, Avri Doria <<mailto:avri@acm.org>avri@acm.org> Cc: "<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT
At a minimum, we should ask what needs to be done to allow some review of it.
Chuck
From:<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org>cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org>mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 12:08 AM To: Grace Abuhamad; Guru Acharya; Avri Doria Cc: <mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT
I believe that any such document must be shared with the CWG, if only with the Co-Chairs or some specific sub-set of the CWG who of course must sign an appropriate confidentiality document and perhaps get clearance for what they share (with an appeal process in the case of a disagreement).
Alan
At 17/12/2014 10:46 PM, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
Hi all,
We looked into this and noted that the Continuity & Contingency Plan is confidential and cannot be distributed.
Notes, transcripts, and recordings for RFP4 call are available here: <https://community.icann.org/x/MYcQAw>https://community.icann.org/x/MYcQAw
Best, Grace
From: Guru Acharya <<mailto:gurcharya@gmail.com>gurcharya@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:05 AM To: Avri Doria <<mailto:avri@acm.org>avri@acm.org> Cc: "<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT
Hi Avri,
This was an action item for the staff from the call on 25th November. I believe they have already put in a request for the document with the IANA staff. Maybe Grace or Marika can update us on the request.
"ACTION staff : Ask IANA staff to share details on 7.3 that might be available for the public and/or online" On 17 Dec 2014 17:29, "Avri Doria" <<mailto:avri@acm.org>avri@acm.org> wrote: Hi, Is that 'transition to a "successor contractor" plan' available to the CWG? avri On 17-Dec-14 05:26, Matthew Shears wrote:
Alan Section C.7 in the current contract addresses issues of continuity of operations - particularly C.7.3, according to which ICANN should have a transition to a "successor contractor" plan in place at the moment Matthew On 12/17/2014 3:38 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
As someone whose ICANN 'job" is supporting/defending the needs of Internet users, I will point out that security and stability of the IANA functions is of paramount importance for the ALAC as well. I look forward to the seeing how that can be assured in a potentially disruptive switch of the IANA operator where it may be that there is no continuity of either staff or systems. Alan At 15/12/2014 03:16 PM, Donna Austin wrote:
All I largely agree with Christopher. I think we are creating complexity where it does not necessarily need to be, but as we are here I want to reiterate a few comments I made on the RFP 3 call earlier today, and these comments come from a gTLD registry operator perspective: · Operational stability and reliability of the IANA service is imperative to the business operations of registry operators and as such this should be a critical consideration in any discussions.
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list <mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org>CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list <mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org>CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list <mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org>CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship