Hi, On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:33:13AM -0300, Greg Shatan wrote:
will first need to gather our facts (and not just the facts that tend to support a particular position), without which any independent counsel will be (literally) clueless.
After some hallway conversations yesterday, it seems to me that, while the above is a good idea, such fact-gathering and so on is really part of implementation. Therefore, it seems to me that (especially since the sample term sheet is called out as not being normative anyway) it would be possible to remove the term sheet annex (or approve the document without it or something like that) in order to send the document to the ICG. After all, by removing the text and standing mute, the proposals as such are not inconsistent. That would allow us to get on with one important task (transmitting to the ICG) while working on another (sorting out the IPR issues). Does that seem reasonable? A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com