Notes, Recordings, Transcript for CWG IANA Meeting ##90 - 1 September
Dear all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Meeting #90 on 1 September 2016 will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/9hOsAw A copy of the notes and action items may be found below. Kind regards, Brenda Action Items * ACTION (ICANN Legal / Sidley): provide CWG with a revised version of the Naming functions agreement including today's points before next CWG call. * Suggestion is to submit redlined version as CWG's comment to the Public Comment after next call (Sept 08) * ACTION (Sidley): propose some revised language on the basis of the feedback received by the group today. * ACTION (staff): forward CWG invitation to Sidley. Notes 1. Status Update (Chairs) * Sidley working directly with ICANN Legal on the Naming functions agreement * Key objective for today's call is to resolve remaining issues with the Naming functions agreement, and the IANA IPR agreement (signatory and CCG representatives) 2. Implementation Update (Trang) * Status update slide presented by Trang 3. Key Issues 3.1. Naming Functions Agreement * Walk-thru Issues list produced by Sidley * A1: no objections, considered closed * A2: no objections, considered closed * A3: alternative language has been proposed by Becky Burr, and further alternative language by Chuck/Milton. Proposed revised wording should include changing "apply" to "consult". Group adopts revised wording. ACTION (ICANN Legal): conform other sections of the agreement that have the same language * A4: no objections, considered closed * A5: no objections, considered closed * A6: no objections, considered closed * A7: discussed the role of the ombudsman as described in the CWG proposal. Group is ok with suppressing the Ombudsman from Phase 2 (no changes to 8.1.b needed). Considered closed. * A8: no objections, considered closed * A9: no objections, considered closed * A10: no objections, considered closed ACTION (ICANN Legal / Sidley): provide CWG with a revised version of the Naming functions agreement including today's points before next CWG call. * Suggestion is to submit redlined version as CWG's comment to the Public Comment after next call (Sept 08) 3.2 IANA IPR * Reviewed letter of instruction drafted by Sidley, designating ICANN as counterparty representing the Naming community for signature of the Community agreement. * Remaining open issues: definition of the Names Community, and designation of CCG representatives. * Definition of the Names community: Greg Shatan provided a summary of the discussion initiated in the mailing list. * Suggestion to nominate initial CCGs from the CWG * Suggestion to have CWG act on this as long as it exists, then possibly the EC. * Suggestion to fill in the blank in the letter by "CWG on behalf of the chartering organizations". * Several objections to designating the CSC. * Suggestion to use PTI board. * Suggestion to use SO/ACs . Which ones? - the chartering organizations, potentially represented by their chairs. ACTION (Sidley): propose some revised language on the basis of the feedback received by the group today. * CCGs need to be selected by September 30th. 5. AOB * Next CWG call: 08 Sep 16 @14:00 UTC. ACTION (staff): forward CWG invitation to Sidley.
participants (1)
-
Brenda Brewer