Here is an MS Word copy. Checking if there is a PDF copy to be had. Greg On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:

Hi,

And is there a pdf copy of survey 2 for consultation no matter how brief they might be?

thanks & apologies if i missed it

avri

On 08-Jan-15 07:37, Greg Shatan wrote:

Just in case you might have difficulty locating the two links, so that you can use this "free hour" :-) productively, I supply them here:

Survey #1: http://goo.gl/forms/q29h3d29he

Survey #2: http://goo.gl/forms/N8smhdeUk8

Greg

_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing listCWG-Stewardship@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

I didn’t even notice the change but my understanding was that the choices would stay the same as in the first survey. Chuck From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 2:30 PM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Survey Links - for your convenience Hi, Thanks to both you and Robert. Started doing S2. Did we have a reason for switching from Strongly Agree to Completely Agree. And why did we do that? And do we really mean completely?! I know as a member I am not answering for myself but for a group, but i can't imagine many things in this world that either I or the NCSG agrees with completely. When you add ambiguity to the questions and the answers, it becomes even more unlikely. avri On 08-Jan-15 12:44, Greg Shatan wrote: Here is an MS Word copy. Checking if there is a PDF copy to be had. Greg On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org>> wrote: Hi, And is there a pdf copy of survey 2 for consultation no matter how brief they might be? thanks & apologies if i missed it avri On 08-Jan-15 07:37, Greg Shatan wrote: Just in case you might have difficulty locating the two links, so that you can use this "free hour" :-)[cid:image001.gif@01D02B53.39882CD0] productively, I supply them here: Survey #1: http://goo.gl/forms/q29h3d29he Survey #2: http://goo.gl/forms/N8smhdeUk8 Greg _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

Just checked the Contract Co/IAP survey. The first bank of questions indeed has “Completely agree” instead of “strongly agree”, the rest however are the same as the previous survey. The error was an oversight on my part, apologies. I’ve revised the form, which should now read “Completely agree” regards Robert

On Jan 8, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:

They should not have changed. You should read it as "Strongly Agree." We should change this in the survey.

On Thursday, January 8, 2015, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com <mailto:cgomes@verisign.com>> wrote: I didn’t even notice the change but my understanding was that the choices would stay the same as in the first survey.

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');>] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 2:30 PM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship@icann.org');> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Survey Links - for your convenience

Hi,

Thanks to both you and Robert.

Started doing S2.

Did we have a reason for switching from Strongly Agree to Completely Agree. And why did we do that? And do we really mean completely?!

I know as a member I am not answering for myself but for a group, but i can't imagine many things in this world that either I or the NCSG agrees with completely. When you add ambiguity to the questions and the answers, it becomes even more unlikely.

avri

On 08-Jan-15 12:44, Greg Shatan wrote:

Here is an MS Word copy. Checking if there is a PDF copy to be had.

Greg

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','avri@acm.org');>> wrote:

Hi,

And is there a pdf copy of survey 2 for consultation no matter how brief they might be?

thanks & apologies if i missed it

avri

On 08-Jan-15 07:37, Greg Shatan wrote:

Just in case you might have difficulty locating the two links, so that you can use this "free hour" :-)<image001.gif> productively, I supply them here:

Survey #1: http://goo.gl/forms/q29h3d29he <http://goo.gl/forms/q29h3d29he> Survey #2: http://goo.gl/forms/N8smhdeUk8 <http://goo.gl/forms/N8smhdeUk8> Greg

_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship@icann.org');> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship>

_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship@icann.org');> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship>

_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship