FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws
All, Please be aware of the latest version of the CWG comment letter. Please note Sharon Flannigan’s comments below including that the Public Comment period closes later today. Thank-you. Jonathan From: Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com] Sent: 10 August 2016 07:21 To: 'Client Committee' <cwg-client@icann.org> Subject: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws Dear Client Committee, Attached is a revised draft of the CWG comment letter on the PTI bylaws. As noted previously, we have updated the letter to address the appointment of the initial independent PTI directors. We also understand that the Nominating Committee will be prepared to begin nominating the two independent PTI directors in 2017 (rather than waiting until 2018 or 2019). These changes are reflected in Sections 4 and 5 of the draft comment letter and in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.5.1 of the revised bylaws. We note that strategy/budget still needs to be finalized in the letter and the draft bylaws. As a reminder, the comment letter is due Thursday, August 11. Best regards, Sharon SHARON R. FLANAGAN SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP +1 415 772 1271 <mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com> sflanagan@sidley.com **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. ****************************************************************************************************
All, At the previous meeting of the CWG, Christopher Wilkinson raised his significant concern about the (CWG) proposed change in the bylaws to reflect that the PTI chair need not be selected from the Nom Com appointees. A chairperson of the Board (the “Chairperson”) shall be elected annually and should be selected from among the Nominating Committee Directors by a majority of the Directors then in office. The President shall not be the Chairperson. Lise & I looked back into this point and we note that this change was introduced recently to the CWG (meetings 82 & 83), reflecting a concern with limiting the slate of potential chairs to only the Nom Com nominated directors, when there could be better qualified candidates from the ICANN nominated directors. Note further that the CWG proposal does not specify this point, Sidley did not oppose it and, unlike other similar points, CWG participants did not raise any objection or support at either meeting 82 or 83. It seemed to go un-noticed by CWG participants. Furthermore, a key point for the CWG co-chairs, as proposed initial directors, is that we could be seen to have a conflict of interest (motivation to limit the slate for chair to ourselves), and so we need to be sensitive to this aspect of the discussion. Therefore, if anyone else feels strongly about this, and assuming so, particularly if they are able to rapidly suggest any pragmatic alternatives which potentially balance the concerns, that may be helpful. Please be acutely aware that our comments on the PTI Bylaws are due in today. Thank-you, Lise & Jonathan From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info] Sent: 11 August 2016 09:09 To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws All, Please be aware of the latest version of the CWG comment letter. Please note Sharon Flannigan’s comments below including that the Public Comment period closes later today. Thank-you. Jonathan From: Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com] Sent: 10 August 2016 07:21 To: 'Client Committee' <cwg-client@icann.org <mailto:cwg-client@icann.org> > Subject: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws Dear Client Committee, Attached is a revised draft of the CWG comment letter on the PTI bylaws. As noted previously, we have updated the letter to address the appointment of the initial independent PTI directors. We also understand that the Nominating Committee will be prepared to begin nominating the two independent PTI directors in 2017 (rather than waiting until 2018 or 2019). These changes are reflected in Sections 4 and 5 of the draft comment letter and in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.5.1 of the revised bylaws. We note that strategy/budget still needs to be finalized in the letter and the draft bylaws. As a reminder, the comment letter is due Thursday, August 11. Best regards, Sharon SHARON R. FLANAGAN SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP +1 415 772 1271 <mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com> sflanagan@sidley.com **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. ****************************************************************************************************
All, At the previous meeting of the CWG, Christopher Wilkinson raised his significant concern about the (CWG) proposed change in the bylaws to reflect that the PTI chair need not be selected from the Nom Com appointees. A chairperson of the Board (the “Chairperson”) shall be elected annually and should be selected from among the Nominating Committee Directors by a majority of the Directors then in office. The President shall not be the Chairperson. Lise & I looked back into this point and we note that this change was introduced recently to the CWG (meetings 82 & 83), reflecting a concern with limiting the slate of potential chairs to only the Nom Com nominated directors, when there could be better qualified candidates from the ICANN nominated directors. Note further that the CWG proposal does not specify this point, Sidley did not oppose it and, unlike other similar points, CWG participants did not raise any objection or support at either meeting 82 or 83. It seemed to go un-noticed by CWG participants. Furthermore, a key point for the CWG co-chairs, as proposed initial directors, is that we could be seen to have a conflict of interest (motivation to limit the slate for chair to ourselves), and so we need to be sensitive to this aspect of the discussion. Therefore, if anyone else feels strongly about this, and assuming so, particularly if they are able to rapidly suggest any pragmatic alternatives which potentially balance the concerns, that may be helpful. Please be acutely aware that our comments on the PTI Bylaws are due in today. Thank-you, Lise & Jonathan From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info] Sent: 11 August 2016 09:09 To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws All, Please be aware of the latest version of the CWG comment letter. Please note Sharon Flannigan’s comments below including that the Public Comment period closes later today. Thank-you. Jonathan From: Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com] Sent: 10 August 2016 07:21 To: 'Client Committee' <cwg-client@icann.org <mailto:cwg-client@icann.org> > Subject: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws Dear Client Committee, Attached is a revised draft of the CWG comment letter on the PTI bylaws. As noted previously, we have updated the letter to address the appointment of the initial independent PTI directors. We also understand that the Nominating Committee will be prepared to begin nominating the two independent PTI directors in 2017 (rather than waiting until 2018 or 2019). These changes are reflected in Sections 4 and 5 of the draft comment letter and in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.5.1 of the revised bylaws. We note that strategy/budget still needs to be finalized in the letter and the draft bylaws. As a reminder, the comment letter is due Thursday, August 11. Best regards, Sharon SHARON R. FLANAGAN SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP +1 415 772 1271 <mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com> sflanagan@sidley.com **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. ****************************************************************************************************
Dear All, I have also concerns on the involvement of Nom,Com, as you know some constituency will not be able to nominate Directors for Nom Com I suggest to take the changes proposed by Christopher but specify the term Majority WHICH MAY BE INTERPRETED AS SIMPLE MAJORITY , by 2/3 Majority. That is all. Kavouss 2016-08-11 12:02 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info>:
All,
At the previous meeting of the CWG, Christopher Wilkinson raised his significant concern about the (CWG) proposed change in the bylaws to reflect that the PTI chair need not be selected from the Nom Com appointees.
A chairperson of the Board (the “*Chairperson*”) shall be elected annually and should be selected from among the Nominating Committee Directors by a majority of the Directors then in office. The President shall not be the Chairperson.
Lise & I looked back into this point and we note that this change was introduced recently to the CWG (meetings 82 & 83), reflecting a concern with limiting the slate of potential chairs to only the Nom Com nominated directors, when there could be better qualified candidates from the ICANN nominated directors. Note further that the CWG proposal does not specify this point, Sidley did not oppose it and, unlike other similar points, CWG participants did not raise any objection or support at either meeting 82 or 83. It seemed to go un-noticed by CWG participants. Furthermore, a key point for the CWG co-chairs, as proposed initial directors, is that we could be seen to have a conflict of interest (motivation to limit the slate for chair to ourselves), and so we need to be sensitive to this aspect of the discussion.
Therefore, if anyone else feels strongly about this, and assuming so, particularly if they are able to rapidly suggest any pragmatic alternatives which potentially balance the concerns, that may be helpful.
Please be acutely aware that our comments on the PTI Bylaws are due in today.
Thank-you,
Lise & Jonathan
*From:* Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info] *Sent:* 11 August 2016 09:09 *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws
All,
Please be aware of the latest version of the CWG comment letter.
Please note Sharon Flannigan’s comments below including that the Public Comment period closes later today.
Thank-you.
Jonathan
*From:* Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com <sflanagan@sidley.com>] *Sent:* 10 August 2016 07:21 *To:* 'Client Committee' <cwg-client@icann.org> *Subject:* [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws
Dear Client Committee,
Attached is a revised draft of the CWG comment letter on the PTI bylaws. As noted previously, we have updated the letter to address the appointment of the initial independent PTI directors. We also understand that the Nominating Committee will be prepared to begin nominating the two independent PTI directors in 2017 (rather than waiting until 2018 or 2019). These changes are reflected in Sections 4 and 5 of the draft comment letter and in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.5.1 of the revised bylaws.
We note that strategy/budget still needs to be finalized in the letter and the draft bylaws.
As a reminder, the comment letter is due Thursday, August 11.
Best regards,
Sharon
*SHARON R. FLANAGAN* *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP*+1 415 772 1271 sflanagan@sidley.com
************************************************************ ****************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.
************************************************************ ****************************************
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
Thanks Jonathan I agree - I don't think we have discussed this as fully as we should have. Chair independence is plain and simple best practice in corporate governance and it would be mistake not to structure PTI in a way that best practice is followed. There are ways of addressing this: 1. Go back to the language in the version of the bylaws that are out for comment: "be selected from among the Nominating Committee Directors by a majority of the Directors then in office". The concerns with this seemed to be whether either of the Nomcom directors would be qualified to be Chair. This could be solved through the NomCom requiring Board chair skills of the candidates (or at least one) and/or through the Nomcom differentiating between the two roles they are filling. 2. Stay with the current approach but structure the selection of the Chair in a manner that ensures the best possible "balance" by adding a qualifer to the majority such as "with at least one ICANN director (non-President) and one NomCom director voting in favor" for example. (My personal preference is for option 1.) I would note that this issue of independence is all the more important given that in the current draft ICANN Directors are not limited in the number of consecutive terms they can sit (which by the way should not be the case and I would argue the CWG should require that the Board consecutive term limits are identical for Nomcom and ICANN Directors (2 x 3 years)) and as a consequence a Chair that is an ICANN Director could be in situ for a considerable period of time. Matthew On 11/08/2016 11:02, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
All,
At the previous meeting of the CWG, Christopher Wilkinson raised his significant concern about the (CWG) proposed change in the bylaws to reflect that the PTI chair need not be selected from the Nom Com appointees.
A chairperson of the Board (the “*Chairperson*”) shall be elected annually and should be selected from among the Nominating Committee Directorsby a majority of the Directors then in office. The President shall not be the Chairperson.
Lise & I looked back into this point and we note that this change was introduced recently to the CWG (meetings 82 & 83), reflecting a concern with limiting the slate of potential chairs to only the Nom Com nominated directors, when there could be better qualified candidates from the ICANN nominated directors. Note further that the CWG proposal does not specify this point, Sidley did not oppose it and, unlike other similar points, CWG participants did not raise any objection or support at either meeting 82 or 83. It seemed to go un-noticed by CWG participants. Furthermore, a key point for the CWG co-chairs, as proposed initial directors, is that we could be seen to have a conflict of interest (motivation to limit the slate for chair to ourselves), and so we need to be sensitive to this aspect of the discussion.
Therefore, if anyone else feels strongly about this, and assuming so, particularly if they are able to rapidly suggest any pragmatic alternatives which potentially balance the concerns, that may be helpful.
Please be acutely aware that our comments on the PTI Bylaws are due in today.
Thank-you,
Lise & Jonathan
*From:*Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info] *Sent:* 11 August 2016 09:09 *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws
All,
Please be aware of the latest version of the CWG comment letter.
Please note Sharon Flannigan’s comments below including that the Public Comment period closes later today.
Thank-you.
Jonathan
*From:*Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com] *Sent:* 10 August 2016 07:21 *To:* 'Client Committee' <cwg-client@icann.org <mailto:cwg-client@icann.org>> *Subject:* [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws
Dear Client Committee,
Attached is a revised draft of the CWG comment letter on the PTI bylaws. As noted previously, we have updated the letter to address the appointment of the initial independent PTI directors. We also understand that the Nominating Committee will be prepared to begin nominating the two independent PTI directors in 2017 (rather than waiting until 2018 or 2019). These changes are reflected in Sections 4 and 5 of the draft comment letter and in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.5.1 of the revised bylaws.
We note that strategy/budget still needs to be finalized in the letter and the draft bylaws.
As a reminder, the comment letter is due Thursday, August 11.
Best regards,
Sharon
*SHARON R. FLANAGAN
**SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP *+1 415 772 1271 sflanagan@sidley.com <mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com>
****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.
****************************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-------------- Matthew Shears Global Internet Policy and Human Rights Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT) + 44 771 2472987
Matthew, I agree with your point, generically. However, I think the analysis is different with regard to subsidiaries and affiliates. It's much more common (if not expected) for chairs of controlled entities' boards to be "non-independent." That said, PTI is not a typical affiliate, and there is a tension between its "affiliated-ness" and its independence. As such, I would leave it to the Board to appoint the most qualified Chair. We could consider term limits for chairs, as a check on your concern (though, of course, the ICANN directors could play round-robin with the Chair should they choose to do so). I don't really have a problem with suggestion 2. It's certainly preferable that the Chair have broad support. I also think the NomCom should be asked to put forward candidates with the potential to be Chair, but I would not give the NomCom any role in designating whether a nominee could or should be Chair. Greg On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:39 AM, matthew shears <mshears@cdt.org> wrote:
Thanks Jonathan
I agree - I don't think we have discussed this as fully as we should have. Chair independence is plain and simple best practice in corporate governance and it would be mistake not to structure PTI in a way that best practice is followed. There are ways of addressing this:
1. Go back to the language in the version of the bylaws that are out for comment: "be selected from among the Nominating Committee Directors by a majority of the Directors then in office". The concerns with this seemed to be whether either of the Nomcom directors would be qualified to be Chair. This could be solved through the NomCom requiring Board chair skills of the candidates (or at least one) and/or through the Nomcom differentiating between the two roles they are filling.
2. Stay with the current approach but structure the selection of the Chair in a manner that ensures the best possible "balance" by adding a qualifer to the majority such as "with at least one ICANN director (non-President) and one NomCom director voting in favor" for example.
(My personal preference is for option 1.)
I would note that this issue of independence is all the more important given that in the current draft ICANN Directors are not limited in the number of consecutive terms they can sit (which by the way should not be the case and I would argue the CWG should require that the Board consecutive term limits are identical for Nomcom and ICANN Directors (2 x 3 years)) and as a consequence a Chair that is an ICANN Director could be in situ for a considerable period of time.
Matthew
On 11/08/2016 11:02, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
All,
At the previous meeting of the CWG, Christopher Wilkinson raised his significant concern about the (CWG) proposed change in the bylaws to reflect that the PTI chair need not be selected from the Nom Com appointees.
A chairperson of the Board (the “*Chairperson*”) shall be elected annually and should be selected from among the Nominating Committee Directors by a majority of the Directors then in office. The President shall not be the Chairperson.
Lise & I looked back into this point and we note that this change was introduced recently to the CWG (meetings 82 & 83), reflecting a concern with limiting the slate of potential chairs to only the Nom Com nominated directors, when there could be better qualified candidates from the ICANN nominated directors. Note further that the CWG proposal does not specify this point, Sidley did not oppose it and, unlike other similar points, CWG participants did not raise any objection or support at either meeting 82 or 83. It seemed to go un-noticed by CWG participants. Furthermore, a key point for the CWG co-chairs, as proposed initial directors, is that we could be seen to have a conflict of interest (motivation to limit the slate for chair to ourselves), and so we need to be sensitive to this aspect of the discussion.
Therefore, if anyone else feels strongly about this, and assuming so, particularly if they are able to rapidly suggest any pragmatic alternatives which potentially balance the concerns, that may be helpful.
Please be acutely aware that our comments on the PTI Bylaws are due in today.
Thank-you,
Lise & Jonathan
*From:* Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info <jrobinson@afilias.info>] *Sent:* 11 August 2016 09:09 *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws
All,
Please be aware of the latest version of the CWG comment letter.
Please note Sharon Flannigan’s comments below including that the Public Comment period closes later today.
Thank-you.
Jonathan
*From:* Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com <sflanagan@sidley.com>] *Sent:* 10 August 2016 07:21 *To:* 'Client Committee' <cwg-client@icann.org> *Subject:* [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws
Dear Client Committee,
Attached is a revised draft of the CWG comment letter on the PTI bylaws. As noted previously, we have updated the letter to address the appointment of the initial independent PTI directors. We also understand that the Nominating Committee will be prepared to begin nominating the two independent PTI directors in 2017 (rather than waiting until 2018 or 2019). These changes are reflected in Sections 4 and 5 of the draft comment letter and in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.5.1 of the revised bylaws.
We note that strategy/budget still needs to be finalized in the letter and the draft bylaws.
As a reminder, the comment letter is due Thursday, August 11.
Best regards,
Sharon
*SHARON R. FLANAGAN * *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP *+1 415 772 1271 sflanagan@sidley.com
************************************************************ ****************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.
************************************************************ ****************************************
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing listCWG-Stewardship@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-------------- Matthew Shears Global Internet Policy and Human Rights Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)+ 44 771 2472987
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
Regarding Draft PTI Bylaws section 9.2, DT-O recommends the following edits as highlighted: (a) At least 270 days prior to the commencement of each fiscal year, the Corporation shall submit to the Board a proposed annual operating plan and budget for the Corporation’s next fiscal year (“Annual Budget”). At the time of submission to the Board, the Corporation shall also submit this proposed Annual Budget to ICANN. (e) Promptly after the Board approves the Annual Budget, the Annual Budget shall be submitted to ICANN for inclusion in ICANN’s proposed Operating Plan and Budget. The Annual Budget shall be submitted to ICANN at least nine months in advance of the next fiscal year. Chuck From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 4:09 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws All, Please be aware of the latest version of the CWG comment letter. Please note Sharon Flannigan’s comments below including that the Public Comment period closes later today. Thank-you. Jonathan From: Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com] Sent: 10 August 2016 07:21 To: 'Client Committee' <cwg-client@icann.org<mailto:cwg-client@icann.org>> Subject: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws Dear Client Committee, Attached is a revised draft of the CWG comment letter on the PTI bylaws. As noted previously, we have updated the letter to address the appointment of the initial independent PTI directors. We also understand that the Nominating Committee will be prepared to begin nominating the two independent PTI directors in 2017 (rather than waiting until 2018 or 2019). These changes are reflected in Sections 4 and 5 of the draft comment letter and in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.5.1 of the revised bylaws. We note that strategy/budget still needs to be finalized in the letter and the draft bylaws. As a reminder, the comment letter is due Thursday, August 11. Best regards, Sharon SHARON R. FLANAGAN SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP +1 415 772 1271 sflanagan@sidley.com<mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com> **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. ****************************************************************************************************
*Dear All,* *In order to be short and concise, I suggest the following : * *(a) At least 9 months prior to the commencement of each fiscal year, the Corporation shall submit to the Board and ICANN a proposed annual operating plan and budget for the Corporation’s next fiscal year (“Annual Budget”). * *(e) Immediately after the Board approves the Annual Budget, it shall be submitted to ICANN for inclusion in ICANN’s proposed Annual Operating Plan and Budget..* *i HOPE THIS STZRAIGHT FORWARD AND CLEAR LANGUAGE DOES NOT CREATE ANY PROBLEM IN THE MIND OF HIGGHLY QUALIFIED TOP EXPERT * *Kavouss * 2016-08-11 13:51 GMT+02:00 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com>:
Regarding Draft PTI Bylaws section 9.2, DT-O recommends the following edits as highlighted:
(a) At least 270 days prior to the commencement of each fiscal year, the Corporation shall submit to the Board a proposed annual operating plan and budget for the Corporation’s next fiscal year (“*Annual Budget*”). At the time of submission to the Board, the Corporation shall also submit this proposed Annual Budget to ICANN.
(e) Promptly after the Board approves the Annual Budget, the Annual Budget shall be submitted to ICANN for inclusion in ICANN’s proposed Operating Plan and Budget. The Annual Budget shall be submitted to ICANN at least nine months in advance of the next fiscal year.
Chuck
*From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship- bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Robinson *Sent:* Thursday, August 11, 2016 4:09 AM *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws
All,
Please be aware of the latest version of the CWG comment letter.
Please note Sharon Flannigan’s comments below including that the Public Comment period closes later today.
Thank-you.
Jonathan
*From:* Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com <sflanagan@sidley.com>] *Sent:* 10 August 2016 07:21 *To:* 'Client Committee' <cwg-client@icann.org> *Subject:* [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws
Dear Client Committee,
Attached is a revised draft of the CWG comment letter on the PTI bylaws. As noted previously, we have updated the letter to address the appointment of the initial independent PTI directors. We also understand that the Nominating Committee will be prepared to begin nominating the two independent PTI directors in 2017 (rather than waiting until 2018 or 2019). These changes are reflected in Sections 4 and 5 of the draft comment letter and in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.5.1 of the revised bylaws.
We note that strategy/budget still needs to be finalized in the letter and the draft bylaws.
As a reminder, the comment letter is due Thursday, August 11.
Best regards,
Sharon
*SHARON R. FLANAGAN * *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP *+1 415 772 1271 sflanagan@sidley.com
************************************************************ ****************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.
************************************************************ ****************************************
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
These edits seem okay to me but I would like Xavier to comment just in case there are any concerns from a staff point of view considering that they proposed the edits. Chuck From: Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 8:22 AM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: jrobinson@afilias.info; cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws Dear All, In order to be short and concise, I suggest the following : (a) At least 9 months prior to the commencement of each fiscal year, the Corporation shall submit to the Board and ICANN a proposed annual operating plan and budget for the Corporation’s next fiscal year (“Annual Budget”). (e) Immediately after the Board approves the Annual Budget, it shall be submitted to ICANN for inclusion in ICANN’s proposed Annual Operating Plan and Budget.. i HOPE THIS STZRAIGHT FORWARD AND CLEAR LANGUAGE DOES NOT CREATE ANY PROBLEM IN THE MIND OF HIGGHLY QUALIFIED TOP EXPERT Kavouss 2016-08-11 13:51 GMT+02:00 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com<mailto:cgomes@verisign.com>>: Regarding Draft PTI Bylaws section 9.2, DT-O recommends the following edits as highlighted: (a) At least 270 days prior to the commencement of each fiscal year, the Corporation shall submit to the Board a proposed annual operating plan and budget for the Corporation’s next fiscal year (“Annual Budget”). At the time of submission to the Board, the Corporation shall also submit this proposed Annual Budget to ICANN. (e) Promptly after the Board approves the Annual Budget, the Annual Budget shall be submitted to ICANN for inclusion in ICANN’s proposed Operating Plan and Budget. The Annual Budget shall be submitted to ICANN at least nine months in advance of the next fiscal year. Chuck From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 4:09 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws All, Please be aware of the latest version of the CWG comment letter. Please note Sharon Flannigan’s comments below including that the Public Comment period closes later today. Thank-you. Jonathan From: Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com] Sent: 10 August 2016 07:21 To: 'Client Committee' <cwg-client@icann.org<mailto:cwg-client@icann.org>> Subject: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws Dear Client Committee, Attached is a revised draft of the CWG comment letter on the PTI bylaws. As noted previously, we have updated the letter to address the appointment of the initial independent PTI directors. We also understand that the Nominating Committee will be prepared to begin nominating the two independent PTI directors in 2017 (rather than waiting until 2018 or 2019). These changes are reflected in Sections 4 and 5 of the draft comment letter and in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.5.1 of the revised bylaws. We note that strategy/budget still needs to be finalized in the letter and the draft bylaws. As a reminder, the comment letter is due Thursday, August 11. Best regards, Sharon SHARON R. FLANAGAN SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP +1 415 772 1271<tel:%2B1%20415%20772%201271> sflanagan@sidley.com<mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com> **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. **************************************************************************************************** _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
I don’t see any objections to the edits suggested by Kavouss. Thank you. Best, Xavier Xavier Calvez ICANN CFO 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 Office : +1 (310) 301 5838 Mobile : +1 (805) 312 0052 Fax : +1 (310) 957-2348 From: <cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Charles Gomes <cgomes@verisign.com> Date: Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 6:03 AM To: Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> Cc: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws These edits seem okay to me but I would like Xavier to comment just in case there are any concerns from a staff point of view considering that they proposed the edits. Chuck From: Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 8:22 AM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: jrobinson@afilias.info; cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws Dear All, In order to be short and concise, I suggest the following : (a) At least 9 months prior to the commencement of each fiscal year, the Corporation shall submit to the Board and ICANN a proposed annual operating plan and budget for the Corporation’s next fiscal year (“Annual Budget”). (e) Immediately after the Board approves the Annual Budget, it shall be submitted to ICANN for inclusion in ICANN’s proposed Annual Operating Plan and Budget.. i HOPE THIS STZRAIGHT FORWARD AND CLEAR LANGUAGE DOES NOT CREATE ANY PROBLEM IN THE MIND OF HIGGHLY QUALIFIED TOP EXPERT Kavouss 2016-08-11 13:51 GMT+02:00 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com>: Regarding Draft PTI Bylaws section 9.2, DT-O recommends the following edits as highlighted: (a) At least 270 days prior to the commencement of each fiscal year, the Corporation shall submit to the Board a proposed annual operating plan and budget for the Corporation’s next fiscal year (“Annual Budget”). At the time of submission to the Board, the Corporation shall also submit this proposed Annual Budget to ICANN. (e) Promptly after the Board approves the Annual Budget, the Annual Budget shall be submitted to ICANN for inclusion in ICANN’s proposed Operating Plan and Budget. The Annual Budget shall be submitted to ICANN at least nine months in advance of the next fiscal year. Chuck From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 4:09 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws All, Please be aware of the latest version of the CWG comment letter. Please note Sharon Flannigan’s comments below including that the Public Comment period closes later today. Thank-you. Jonathan From: Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com] Sent: 10 August 2016 07:21 To: 'Client Committee' <cwg-client@icann.org> Subject: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws Dear Client Committee, Attached is a revised draft of the CWG comment letter on the PTI bylaws. As noted previously, we have updated the letter to address the appointment of the initial independent PTI directors. We also understand that the Nominating Committee will be prepared to begin nominating the two independent PTI directors in 2017 (rather than waiting until 2018 or 2019). These changes are reflected in Sections 4 and 5 of the draft comment letter and in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.5.1 of the revised bylaws. We note that strategy/budget still needs to be finalized in the letter and the draft bylaws. As a reminder, the comment letter is due Thursday, August 11. Best regards, Sharon SHARON R. FLANAGAN SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP +1 415 772 1271 sflanagan@sidley.com **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. **************************************************************************************************** _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
participants (7)
-
Gomes, Chuck -
Greg Shatan -
Jonathan Robinson -
Jonathan Robinson -
Kavouss Arasteh -
matthew shears -
Xavier J. Calvez