Thanks for sharing this Jonathan. I note from CRISP response that going the IETF trust route would require less/no further consultation with her community. I think we (CWG) could agree to this route as well, while indicating the expected "high level" principles for the holder of the IPR. The principles can then be developed further at the implementation phase. Regards On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:

-----Original Message----- From: Izumi Okutani [mailto:izumi@nic.ad.jp] Sent: 17 August 2015 17:08 Subject: The CRISP Team observation on IPR

Dear Jonathan and Lise,

I'd appreciate it if you would help us share this with the CWG. As others have expressed in a seperate thread, it's great to see the CWG discussions are now moving towards consensus.

Talk to you in a few hours.

Thanks, Izumi & Nurani

--- Dear CWG members,

Attached is the CRISP Team observation on IPR. It is not fully brushed up nor articulate in terms of wording, as the CRISP Team wanted to deliver this to the CWG as early as possible, but all the points to be shared with the CWG are covered.

We hope this serves as a reference in your discussions, and we would be happy to provide any additional information, clarifications needed for discussions in the CWG.

Best Regards, Izumi Okutani, Nurani Nimpuno Chair, Vice-Chair, The CRISP Team

_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>* The key to understanding is humility - my view !