Fwd: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement
All, I am forwarding a revised version of the Community Agreement, prepared primarily by the IETF Trust's counsel. Please reply if you have any further comments on this draft. Please note that everyone (including the CWG) will have the opportunity to comment during the Public Comment period, which is set to begin *Thursday*. The major open issue is the entity that will be the signatory for the names community. It would be good to resolve this, even provisionally, so that it may part of the document when sent out for public comment. Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46 AM Subject: Fwd: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement To: Client <cwg-client@icann.org> Client Committee, Here is a revised version of the Community Agreement. Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:41 PM Subject: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement To: "iana-ipr@nro.net" <iana-ipr@nro.net> All – here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF. I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow. Best regards, Jorge Jorge L. Contreras Contreras Legal Strategy LLC 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710 Washington, DC 20036 contreraslegal@att.net The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately. _______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
All, I have reviewed the revised version of the Community Agreement which represents good progress over the prior draft. I have suggested a few changes in the attached draft. An additional open item -- we need a description of IANA Naming Services. Again, even a tentative description would fill the void and allow for public comment on the draft language, rather than the void. Greg On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
I am forwarding a revised version of the Community Agreement, prepared primarily by the IETF Trust's counsel. Please reply if you have any further comments on this draft. Please note that everyone (including the CWG) will have the opportunity to comment during the Public Comment period, which is set to begin *Thursday*.
The major open issue is the entity that will be the signatory for the names community. It would be good to resolve this, even provisionally, so that it may part of the document when sent out for public comment.
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46 AM Subject: Fwd: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement To: Client <cwg-client@icann.org>
Client Committee,
Here is a revised version of the Community Agreement.
Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:41 PM Subject: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement To: "iana-ipr@nro.net" <iana-ipr@nro.net>
All – here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF. I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow.
Best regards, Jorge
Jorge L. Contreras Contreras Legal Strategy LLC 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710 Washington, DC 20036 contreraslegal@att.net
The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Dear All We have received a draft in the afternoon of 10 August for comment within less than 10 hours. It is FUNY AND JOKE???? Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Aug 2016, at 17:22, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
I have reviewed the revised version of the Community Agreement which represents good progress over the prior draft. I have suggested a few changes in the attached draft.
An additional open item -- we need a description of IANA Naming Services. Again, even a tentative description would fill the void and allow for public comment on the draft language, rather than the void.
Greg
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote: All,
I am forwarding a revised version of the Community Agreement, prepared primarily by the IETF Trust's counsel. Please reply if you have any further comments on this draft. Please note that everyone (including the CWG) will have the opportunity to comment during the Public Comment period, which is set to begin Thursday.
The major open issue is the entity that will be the signatory for the names community. It would be good to resolve this, even provisionally, so that it may part of the document when sent out for public comment.
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46 AM Subject: Fwd: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement To: Client <cwg-client@icann.org>
Client Committee,
Here is a revised version of the Community Agreement.
Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:41 PM Subject: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement To: "iana-ipr@nro.net" <iana-ipr@nro.net>
All – here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF. I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow.
Best regards, Jorge
Jorge L. Contreras Contreras Legal Strategy LLC 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710 Washington, DC 20036 contreraslegal@att.net
The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
<GS Comments on Community-Agreement - 08-08-2016 marked against 08-05 (1).docx> _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
Kavouss, While I occasionally strive for amusement (and even more occasionally achieve it), this is not one of those times. I apologize for not distributing it last night when I received it, but I was attending to family matters. There are relatively few changes in the document, so it shouldn't take too long to review. I thought you would be happy that your comment on "unanimously" was taken into account, at least in part. I'll endeavor to circulate further drafts upon receipt. Greg On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All We have received a draft in the afternoon of 10 August for comment within less than 10 hours. It is FUNY AND JOKE????
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Aug 2016, at 17:22, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
I have reviewed the revised version of the Community Agreement which represents good progress over the prior draft. I have suggested a few changes in the attached draft.
An additional open item -- we need a description of IANA Naming Services. Again, even a tentative description would fill the void and allow for public comment on the draft language, rather than the void.
Greg
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
I am forwarding a revised version of the Community Agreement, prepared primarily by the IETF Trust's counsel. Please reply if you have any further comments on this draft. Please note that everyone (including the CWG) will have the opportunity to comment during the Public Comment period, which is set to begin *Thursday*.
The major open issue is the entity that will be the signatory for the names community. It would be good to resolve this, even provisionally, so that it may part of the document when sent out for public comment.
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46 AM Subject: Fwd: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement To: Client <cwg-client@icann.org>
Client Committee,
Here is a revised version of the Community Agreement.
Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:41 PM Subject: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement To: "iana-ipr@nro.net" <iana-ipr@nro.net>
All – here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF. I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow.
Best regards, Jorge
Jorge L. Contreras Contreras Legal Strategy LLC 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710 Washington, DC 20036 contreraslegal@att.net
The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
<GS Comments on Community-Agreement - 08-08-2016 marked against 08-05 (1).docx>
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 07:23:57PM +0200, Arasteh wrote:
It is FUNY AND JOKE????
No. It is what several of us warned about some time ago. There is no way to move the Thursday date. Best regards, A (usual disclaimer about hats applies) -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Grec Tks for reply. I understand the situation now Regards Kavouss 2016-08-10 19:29 GMT+02:00 Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 07:23:57PM +0200, Arasteh wrote:
It is FUNY AND JOKE????
No. It is what several of us warned about some time ago. There is no way to move the Thursday date.
Best regards,
A (usual disclaimer about hats applies)
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
Thanks for the share, not sure of the need for (...or the “Numbers Community”...) Since the NRO is already indicated. Nevertheless, that may be within the numbers community to decide on. As to the names entity, can we check with legal on whether there will be any illegality if ICANN signs? Regards Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 10 Aug 2016 15:52, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
I am forwarding a revised version of the Community Agreement, prepared primarily by the IETF Trust's counsel. Please reply if you have any further comments on this draft. Please note that everyone (including the CWG) will have the opportunity to comment during the Public Comment period, which is set to begin *Thursday*.
The major open issue is the entity that will be the signatory for the names community. It would be good to resolve this, even provisionally, so that it may part of the document when sent out for public comment.
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46 AM Subject: Fwd: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement To: Client <cwg-client@icann.org>
Client Committee,
Here is a revised version of the Community Agreement.
Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:41 PM Subject: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement To: "iana-ipr@nro.net" <iana-ipr@nro.net>
All – here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF. I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow.
Best regards, Jorge
Jorge L. Contreras Contreras Legal Strategy LLC 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710 Washington, DC 20036 contreraslegal@att.net
The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
I think that, because this is a "Community Agreement" and there are references to the three communities, it was thought best to keep this reference. There have been no objections from the numbers community reps (or anyone else). CWG Legal counsel is reviewing both ICANN and the EC as potential signatories. I don't believe ICANN legal has been asked about either, but they probably should be asked. I'll take that up on the Client Committee list. Greg On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for the share, not sure of the need for (...or the “Numbers Community”...) Since the NRO is already indicated. Nevertheless, that may be within the numbers community to decide on.
As to the names entity, can we check with legal on whether there will be any illegality if ICANN signs?
Regards
Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 10 Aug 2016 15:52, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
I am forwarding a revised version of the Community Agreement, prepared primarily by the IETF Trust's counsel. Please reply if you have any further comments on this draft. Please note that everyone (including the CWG) will have the opportunity to comment during the Public Comment period, which is set to begin *Thursday*.
The major open issue is the entity that will be the signatory for the names community. It would be good to resolve this, even provisionally, so that it may part of the document when sent out for public comment.
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46 AM Subject: Fwd: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement To: Client <cwg-client@icann.org>
Client Committee,
Here is a revised version of the Community Agreement.
Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:41 PM Subject: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement To: "iana-ipr@nro.net" <iana-ipr@nro.net>
All – here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF. I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow.
Best regards, Jorge
Jorge L. Contreras Contreras Legal Strategy LLC 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710 Washington, DC 20036 contreraslegal@att.net
The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
participants (5)
-
Andrew Sullivan -
Arasteh -
Greg Shatan -
Kavouss Arasteh
-
Seun Ojedeji