On 27 апр. 2015, at 14:10, Yuriy Kargapolov <yvk@uanic.info> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Ok, it's good suggestion from Dmitry, but... If you are prompted to remove something, then offer something instead this
So, @Dmitry, - knowing very difficult nuances that you are stressed; - agreeing that the issues related to religion are not subject our consideration; - taking into account that the properties of the Cyrillic character repertoire may dictate nuances for the Rules (for example, this may be difficult to explain Integration Panel the use of the "apostrophe", what you yourself already know) there is a suggestion: Can you, Dmitry, not just to offer to drop the paragraph 1 in the existing wording? Do you ready to offer us a compromise variant?
A compromise which would say that Cyrillic is important, that it is part of cultural supremacy etc? No. I don't think so. The whole thing reeks of Soviet history books and Bolshevik ideas of "three sister nations" and other made-up things. I can of course say that we should pay more attention to actual work on alphabets - but for Ukrainian language (where I am going to contribute) the alphabet issue is very clear - all letters but apostrophe are in MSR. What else? -- dk@