I would strongly recommend to drop all those religious references. The whole paragraph is out of scope, and references to tribes spreading "Orthodox faith" are weak (Christianity? Many nations using Cyrillic alphabet had other religions; for example, Russians practiced Islam; some Ukrainians are Catholic; and I don't think Mongols are predominantly Christians etc.) We should stick to character repertoires and other tasks that are in scope and leave politics to politicians, and religion to priests.
On 27 апр. 2015, at 08:14, Alexei Sozonov <a.sozon@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Colleagues:
it seems that some points not delivered correctly:
1. In the first chapter \ introduction from the clause
" for the countries of Central and Eastern Europe where Slavic tribes lived and formed the Slavic states – it was factor in the spread of Christianity, the Orthodox faith and religious or basic education in the Middle Ages;"
it's important to understand that evidences exist that not only "Slavic tribes" but well developed cities and states lead us back in history. So its obvious that we have no grounds have term "tribes" in the report here, and when ever it my appear in the text.
2. From linguistic point there is one important and true point that need to be emphasized to appreciate the scope of the languages we work - the simple fact, that closest language to our proto-Cyrillic language (pre Russian/Ukrainian) is Sanskrit, that considered the oldest in India, and the world, needless to say West Europe. This is important as it gives right historical perspective to scope of language in total, and the role of Kiril and Methodius is just alphabet. The Language should not be treated as new born after alphabet compilation, but should be discussed in its real glory and retrospective.
Thank you,
Alexei Sozonov
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Yuriy Kargapolov <yvk@uanic.info> wrote: @Vladimir, I redirect this file to common emaling
@ALL, my remarks and explanations on file in regard discussion during last conf-call
point #1
As result of discussion - we erased Table no.3 from body of "Proposal..." AT THIS STAGE.
It's clear, during conf-call, to my mind, all are understood this point which has been proposed by Vladimir.
The main aspect after exluding Table no.3:
1) Table no. 3 - one of bases of our work
2) Stage no. 2:
2.1) at this stage MUST be Table no.3
2.2) Very strong efforts for emergence of this Table for aims our
future activity.
3) Stage no.3 and follow-up activity - operation with Table no. 3
point #2
Please, find, paragraph 3.5 and check deadline for tasks and subtasks
WE HAVE 4 DAYS UP TO APR, 28 ONLY
---
Best Regards,
Yuri
This is a forwarded message
From: Vladimir Shadrunov <info@vlad.tel>
To: Yuriy Kargapolov <yvk@uanic.info>, Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org>, Dusan Stojicevic <dusan@dukes.in.rs>
Date: Thursday, April 23, 2015, 5:00:27 PM
Subject: Character repertoire
===8<==============Original message text===============
Hi,
To illustrate what I was talking about on the call today - I think we need to keep a proper record of where the Character repertoire is coming from.
I suggest that we fill in the spreadsheet attached which includes the name of the author, the name of the reviewer and source of information. We then post this spreadsheet to the list for the record.
Once this is done we will at least be able to judge if the process to generate those tables was robust.
Sorry Yuriy, I wasn't able to capture all the names that you mentioned on the call - so if you can just fill them in - that would be quickest I believe.
Thanks,
Vladimir
===8<===========End of original message text===========
_______________________________________________ Cyrillicgp mailing list Cyrillicgp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cyrillicgp
-- С уважением, Алексей Созонов, _______________________________________________ Cyrillicgp mailing list Cyrillicgp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cyrillicgp