@Dmitry, I allow myself to make a remark. There was a very simple request - can you offer not just delete the partition and offer something instead - a another subject for discussion in point 1 As I understand situation, you offered to delete paragraph 1 only - and can't propose instead "anything". It's clear, and, please, you should so write. No need to write about some "Bolsheviks", "Soviet Union", "three sister nations" etc. This is not the place for political statements. Here big friendly community. Sorry if... and with the hope of understanding in the future work. --- Best Regards, Yuri Monday, April 27, 2015, 3:59:47 PM, you wrote:
On 27 апр. 2015, at 14:10, Yuriy Kargapolov <yvk@uanic.info> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Ok, it's good suggestion from Dmitry, but... If you are prompted to remove something, then offer something instead this
So, @Dmitry, - knowing very difficult nuances that you are stressed; - agreeing that the issues related to religion are not subject our consideration; - taking into account that the properties of the Cyrillic character repertoire may dictate nuances for the Rules (for example, this may be difficult to explain Integration Panel the use of the "apostrophe", what you yourself already know) there is a suggestion: Can you, Dmitry, not just to offer to drop the paragraph 1 in the existing wording? Do you ready to offer us a compromise variant?
A compromise which would say that Cyrillic is important, that it is part of cultural supremacy etc? No. I don't think so. The whole thing reeks of Soviet history books and Bolshevik ideas of "three sister nations" and other made-up things.
I can of course say that we should pay more attention to actual work on alphabets - but for Ukrainian language (where I am going to contribute) the alphabet issue is very clear - all letters but apostrophe are in MSR. What else?
-- dk@