Yuriy, Some comments from me. I have read this document and it seems to me we have way too much on “history” (and a bit on “politics” for example the Old Slavonic part). The problem I have with so much “history” is that most of this is not really facts, but various interpretations and we can’t really verify most of it. It is also confusing to include Glagolics, probably we should not mention another unrelated script at all — because even if both scripts were used for the same languages, the scripts do not even have a connection with each other. (or even if they do have any influence, this is scientific research topic outside of our work). I also have a problem with the institutional definition of my organization, Register.BG: it runs the .BG ccTLD only. The .БГ IDN ccTLD has not yet been approved by ICANN and we haven’t taken over Serbia (yet) <grin> Please fix this. In general, I think we could clean up the document a bit and make it easier to read. But this task might run in parralal with our main work. I have been thinking on how to automate/streamline the process of selecting approriate characters for the LGR, so that would also ease any future work on next versions. Hope to have it more formally defined so we can discuss it at the next call. Best Regards, Daniel Register.BG
On 15.09.2015 г., at 14:48, Yuriy Kargapolov <yvk@uanic.info> wrote:
Dear ALL,
Please, find attach. It's new version of "Proposal..." I tried take into account the remarks and comments of the IP, but it's previously draft - the most important and significant comments waiting from members of the Cyrillic Generation Panel I suspect that took into account all of the IP's comments. In particular, I didn't touch working plan, but this doesn't mean that I don't agree with the suggestions of the IP. We are waiting for relevant proposal.
Regards,
Yuri<Setting up the Cyrillic Generation Panel_v2.2.docx>_______________________________________________ Cyrillicgp mailing list Cyrillicgp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cyrillicgp